Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30648804›Full record

SynthesisJournal of midwifery & women's health2019

Influence of Maternal Obesity on Labor Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jessica A Ellis, Carolyn M Brown, Brian Barger, Nicole S Carlson

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of midwifery & women's health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05262738 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Misoprostol Dosing in BMI Greater Than 30: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Texas at AustinRan2022 to 2023Enrolled180ConditionsPregnancy Related, Obesity, Labor Onset and Length AbnormalitiesArms50 Micrograms Vaginal Misoprostol (Intervention), 25 Micrograms Vaginal Misoprostol (Control)
NCT06199154 early_phase1recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Induction of Labor in Morbidly Obese Patients: Comparison of 50 mcg and 25 mcg Misoprostol - A Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Maryland, BaltimoreRan2024 to 2027Enrolled162ConditionsMorbid Obesity, PregnancyArmsMisoprostol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Time of day of induction impacts the total duration of labor.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Body mass index and failed induction of labor: A cohort study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carolyn M Brown
Brian Barger
Georgia College & State University · USIntermountain Healthcare · US

Funding

Metabolomics of Labor Dysfunction in African-American WomenK01NR016984 · NINR · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CARLSON, NICOLE S. · 2017 to 2019
$265k
National Institutes of Health 1K01NR016984NINR NIH HHS K01 NR016984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStudies have shown that women with obesity have longer labors. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to examine existing evidence regarding labor induction in women with obesity, including processes and outcomes. The primary outcome was cesarean birth following labor induction. Secondary outcomes were the timing and dosage of prostaglandins, the success of mechanical cervical ripening methods, and synthetic oxytocin dose and timing.

methodsSearches were performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, EBSCO, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Database of Abstracts of Effects, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Searches were limited to studies published in English after 1990. Ten studies published between 2009 and 2017 were included in this review. All were observational studies comparing processes and outcomes of induction of labor in relation to maternal body mass index. The primary outcome was cesarean birth following labor induction. We assessed heterogeneity using Cochran's Q test and tau-squared and I

resultsTen cohort studies met inclusion criteria; 8 studies had data available for a meta-analysis of the primary outcome. Cesarean birth was more common among women with obesity compared with women of normal weight following labor induction (Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect odds ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.55-2.12; P < .001). Maternal obesity was associated with a longer time to birth, higher doses of prostaglandins, less frequent success of cervical ripening methods, and higher dose of synthetic oxytocin, as well as a longer time to birth after oxytocin use. DISCUSSION: Women with obesity are more likely than women with a normal weight to end labor induction with cesarean birth. Additionally, women with obesity require longer labor inductions involving larger, more frequent applications of both cervical ripening methods and synthetic oxytocin.

Indexed as

Labor, InducedCervical RipeningCesarean SectionFemaleHumansObservational Studies as TopicOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareOxytocicsOxytocinPregnancyPregnancy in ObesityPregnancy OutcomeProstaglandinsOxytocicsOxytocinProstaglandinscervical ripeninginduction of laborintrapartumobesityoxytocinprostaglandinstranscervical catheters

Identifiers

PMID30648804
PMCPMC6758543
OpenAlexW2908964849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.