ReviewAnnals of cardiac anaesthesia
Cardiac output monitoring: Technology and choice.
Review in Annals of cardiac anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Cardiac Index (CI) Measurements Performed With Use of the Bioreactance Technology and Transpulmonary Thermodilution in Reference to Measurements Based on Echocardiography.
The Effect of Non-invasive Hemodynamic Goal-directed Therapy on the Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury in Circulatory Shock: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A recommendation for the use of electrical biosensing technology in neonatology.Pediatric research · 2025Guideline
- Accuracy and Trending Ability of Electrical Biosensing Technology for Non-invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Neonates: A Systematic Qualitative Review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Pooled it
- Inflammatory and Cardiovascular Responses to Active and Passive Acute Psychological Stress.Biopsychosocial science and medicineTrial
- Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring with Electrical Cardiometry During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery, a Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Continuous Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Cirrhotic Patients-Friend or Foe?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- An in silico analysis of heart rate impact on wall shear stress hemodynamic parameters in aortic coarctation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.Cardiorenal medicine · 2025Review
- Implantation of porcine amniotic epithelial cells model for myocardial infarction combined with cardiomyocyte therapy of pigs (Open veterinary journal · 2025Article
- Genetic Determinants of Endurance: A Narrative Review on Elite Athlete Status and Performance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Dynamic Estimation of Cardiovascular State From Arterial Blood Pressure Recordings.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2024Article
- Vasoconstriction with phenylephrine increases cardiac output in preload dependent patients.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2024Article
- Cardiovascular Effects of Tourniquet Application with Cardiac Cycle Efficiency: A Prospective Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the image quality and validity of handheld echocardiography for stroke volume and left ventricular ejection fraction quantification: a method comparison study.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Article
- Bioreactance assessment of cardiac output lacks reliability for the follow-up of patients with pulmonary hypertension.PloS one · 2024Article
- Review
- The Effect of Intraoperative Hypotension on Postoperative Renal Function.Current anesthesiology reports · 2023Article
- A new continuous noninvasive finger cuff device (Vitalstream) for cardiac output that communicates wirelessly via bluetooth or Wi-Fi.BMC anesthesiology · 2023Article
- Agreement between Electrical Cardiometry and Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution for Measuring Cardiac Output in Isoflurane-Anesthetized Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate quantification of cardiac output (CO) is given vital importance in modern medical practice, especially in high-risk surgical and critically ill patients. CO monitoring together with perioperative protocols to guide intravenous fluid therapy and inotropic support with the aim of improving CO and oxygen delivery has shown to improve perioperative outcomes in high-risk surgical patients. Understanding of the underlying principles of CO measuring devices helps in knowing the limitations of their use and allows more effective and safer utilization. At present, no single CO monitoring device can meet all the clinical requirements considering the limitations of diverse CO monitoring techniques. The evidence for the minimally invasive CO monitoring is conflicting; however, different CO monitoring devices may be used during the clinical course of patients as an integrated approach based on their invasiveness and the need for additional hemodynamic data. These devices add numerical trend information for anesthesiologists and intensivists to use in determining the most appropriate management of their patients and at present, do not completely prohibit but do increasingly limit the use of the pulmonary artery catheter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.