ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2019
Machine learning-based prediction of future breast cancer using algorithmically measured background parenchymal enhancement on high-risk screening MRI.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- ESR Essentials: artificial intelligence in breast imaging-practice recommendations by the European Society of Breast Imaging.European radiology · 2026Guideline
- Development and performance of female breast cancer incidence risk prediction models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Breast cancer risk prediction using machine learning: a systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- An Assessment of the Predictive Performance of Current Machine Learning-Based Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models: Systematic Review.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2022Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in breast cancer imaging: a systematic review of diagnostic performance, predictive modeling, and clinical translation.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Automated calculation of background parenchymal enhancement as a biomarker of treatment responses and recurrence-free survival in breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in breast imaging: From theoretical promise to clinical mirage?European radiology · 2026Article
- The Clinical Application of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Imaging: Current Insights, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of breast cancer · 2025Review
- Application of Machine Learning to Breast MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Review
- Clinical Application of Artificial Intelligence in Breast MRI.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025Review
- AI Applications to Breast MRI: Today and Tomorrow.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2024Review
- Review
- Article
- Quantitative assessment of background parenchymal enhancement is associated with lifetime breast cancer risk in screening MRI.European radiology · 2024Article
- New Frontiers in Breast Cancer Imaging: The Rise of AI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Computerized assessment of background parenchymal enhancement on breast dynamic contrast-enhanced-MRI including electronic lesion removal.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- Automated Background Parenchymal Enhancement Measurements at MRI to Predict Breast Cancer Risk.Radiology · 2023Article
- Expanding Horizons: The Realities of CAD, the Promise of Artificial Intelligence, and Machine Learning's Role in Breast Imaging beyond Screening Mammography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Beyond Breast Density: Risk Measures for Breast Cancer in Multiple Imaging Modalities.Radiology · 2023Review
- Breast MRI Background Parenchymal Enhancement Categorization Using Deep Learning: Outperforming the Radiologist.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPreliminary work has demonstrated that background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) assessed by radiologists is predictive of future breast cancer in women undergoing high-risk screening MRI. Algorithmically assessed measures of BPE offer a more precise and reproducible means of measuring BPE than human readers and thus might improve the predictive performance of future cancer development. PURPOSE: To determine if algorithmically extracted imaging features of BPE on screening breast MRI in high-risk women are associated with subsequent development of cancer. STUDY TYPE: Case-control study. POPULATION: In all, 133 women at high risk for developing breast cancer; 46 of these patients developed breast cancer subsequently over a follow-up period of 2 years. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 5 T or 3.0 T T ASSESSMENT: Automatic features of BPE were extracted with a computer algorithm. Subjective BPE scores from five breast radiologists (blinded to clinical outcomes) were also available. STATISTICAL TESTS: Leave-one-out crossvalidation for a multivariate logistic regression model developed using the automatic features and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were performed to calculate the area under the curve (AUC). Comparison of automatic features and subjective features was performed using a generalized regression model and the P-value was obtained. Odds ratios for automatic and subjective features were compared.
resultsThe multivariate model discriminated patients who developed cancer from the patients who did not, with an AUC of 0.70 (95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.79, P < 0.001). The imaging features remained independently predictive of subsequent development of cancer (P < 0.003) when compared with the subjective BPE assessment of the readers. DATA
conclusionAutomatically extracted BPE measurements may potentially be used to further stratify risk in patients undergoing high-risk screening MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 5 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:456-464.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.