Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30648316›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2019

Machine learning-based prediction of future breast cancer using algorithmically measured background parenchymal enhancement on high-risk screening MRI.

Ashirbani Saha, Lars J Grimm, Sujata V Ghate, Connie E Kim, Mary S Soo, Sora C Yoon, Maciej A Mazurowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Application of Machine Learning to Breast MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  10. Clinical Application of Artificial Intelligence in Breast MRI.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025
    Review
  11. AI Applications to Breast MRI: Today and Tomorrow.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. New Frontiers in Breast Cancer Imaging: The Rise of AI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ashirbani SahaDepartment of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7650-1720
Lars J GrimmDepartment of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Sujata V GhateDepartment of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Connie E KimDepartment of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Mary S SooDepartment of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Sora C YoonDepartment of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Maciej A MazurowskiDepartment of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Machine learning and collaborative filtering tools for personalized education in digital breast tomosynthesisR01EB021360 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MAZUROWSKI, MACIEJ A. · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB021360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreliminary work has demonstrated that background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) assessed by radiologists is predictive of future breast cancer in women undergoing high-risk screening MRI. Algorithmically assessed measures of BPE offer a more precise and reproducible means of measuring BPE than human readers and thus might improve the predictive performance of future cancer development. PURPOSE: To determine if algorithmically extracted imaging features of BPE on screening breast MRI in high-risk women are associated with subsequent development of cancer. STUDY TYPE: Case-control study. POPULATION: In all, 133 women at high risk for developing breast cancer; 46 of these patients developed breast cancer subsequently over a follow-up period of 2 years. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 5 T or 3.0 T T ASSESSMENT: Automatic features of BPE were extracted with a computer algorithm. Subjective BPE scores from five breast radiologists (blinded to clinical outcomes) were also available. STATISTICAL TESTS: Leave-one-out crossvalidation for a multivariate logistic regression model developed using the automatic features and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were performed to calculate the area under the curve (AUC). Comparison of automatic features and subjective features was performed using a generalized regression model and the P-value was obtained. Odds ratios for automatic and subjective features were compared.

resultsThe multivariate model discriminated patients who developed cancer from the patients who did not, with an AUC of 0.70 (95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.79, P < 0.001). The imaging features remained independently predictive of subsequent development of cancer (P < 0.003) when compared with the subjective BPE assessment of the readers. DATA

conclusionAutomatically extracted BPE measurements may potentially be used to further stratify risk in patients undergoing high-risk screening MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 5 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:456-464.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdultAgedAlgorithmsBreastBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedPredictive Value of Testsbackground parenchymal enhancementbreast maskbreast MRIhigh-risk breast cancer patientshigh-risk screeningvessel segmentation

Identifiers

PMID30648316
PMCPMC6625842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.