Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30648296›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2019

Prevalence, risk factors, and characterization of multidrug resistant and extended spectrum β-lactamase/AmpC β-lactamase producing Escherichia coli in healthy horses in France in 2015.

Maud de Lagarde, Caroline Larrieu, Karine Praud, Catherine Schouler, Benoît Doublet, Guillaume Sallé, John M Fairbrother, Julie Arsenault

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fecal Carriage of Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase/AmpC-ProducingApplied and environmental microbiology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Multidrug-Resistant ESBL/AmpC-ProducingAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  12. Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase-ProducingAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producingJournal of equine science · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maud de LagardeOIE Reference Laboratory for Escherichia coli, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8179-7514
Caroline LarrieuISP, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Université François Rabelais de Tours, Nouzilly, France.
Karine PraudISP, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Université François Rabelais de Tours, Nouzilly, France.
Catherine SchoulerISP, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Université François Rabelais de Tours, Nouzilly, France.
Benoît DoubletISP, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Université François Rabelais de Tours, Nouzilly, France.
Guillaume SalléISP, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Université François Rabelais de Tours, Nouzilly, France.
John M FairbrotherOIE Reference Laboratory for Escherichia coli, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Julie ArsenaultDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

Institut national de recherche agro-alimentaire (INRA)l'Institut Francais du cheval et de l'équitation (IFCE)OIE Reference Laboratory for E. coli
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough antimicrobial resistance is increasingly common in equine medicine, molecular and epidemiological data remains scarce.

objectivesWe estimated the prevalence of, and risk factors for, shedding of multidrug resistant (MDR), extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing, and AmpC β-lactamase-producing, or some combination of these in Escherichia coli in horses in France. We characterized ESBL/AmpC isolates for antimicrobial susceptibility and the presence of virulence and ESBL/AmpC-associated resistance genes. ANIMALS: Fecal samples from healthy adult horses at 41 premises were collected. A questionnaire was completed by each premises manager. A subset of these samples was tested to build 2 bacterial collections.

methodsIndicator (without enrichment) and specific (enrichment with ceftriaxone) E. coli tested for antimicrobial susceptibility. Prevalence of isolates nonsusceptible to antimicrobials was estimated at the horse and the premises level. The ESBL/AmpC and virulence genes were identified by PCR. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate risk factors for MDR and ESBL/AmpC isolates at premises.

resultsApproximately 44% of horses shed MDR E. coli. Resistance most commonly was observed to ampicillin, streptomycin, and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Twenty-nine percent of premises housed horses shedding ESBL/AmpC-producing isolates. The ESBL/AmpC gene most commonly identified was bla CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Prevalence of healthy horses harboring ESBL/AmpC genes and MDR isolates in their intestinal microbiota is substantial. Risk factors could be used to elaborate guidelines to prevent their dissemination.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesDrug Resistance, MultipleEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFecesFranceHorse DiseasesHorsesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPrevalenceRisk FactorsVirulenceAmpC beta-lactamasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactamasesantimicrobial resistancecephalosporinaseequinemicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID30648296
PMCPMC6430864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.