Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30647922›Full record

ReviewJournal of hip preservation surgery2018

Graft choices for acetabular labral reconstruction.

Ran Atzmon, Joshua R Radparvar, Zachary T Sharfman, Alison A Dallich, Eyal Amar, Ehud Rath

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Acetabular labral reconstruction with medial meniscal allograft: preliminary results of a new surgical technique.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Labral reconstruction with polyurethane implant.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Arthroscopic acetabular labral reconstruction: a review.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Does peer review have a future?Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ran AtzmonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Assuta Medical Center, Faculty of Health and Science and Ben Gurion University, Ha-Refu'a St 7, Ashdod, Israel.
Joshua R RadparvarDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine and Tel Aviv University, Weizmann St 6, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
Zachary T SharfmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Forcheimer Building, Bronx, NY, USA.
Alison A DallichDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine and Tel Aviv University, Weizmann St 6, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
Eyal AmarDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine and Tel Aviv University, Weizmann St 6, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
Ehud RathDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine and Tel Aviv University, Weizmann St 6, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The acetabular labrum plays a key role in maintaining hip function and minimizing hip degeneration. Once thought to be a rare pathology, advances in imaging have led to an increase in the number of diagnosed labral tears. While still a relatively new field, labral reconstruction surgery is an option for tears that are irreparable or require revision after primary repair. Various autograft and allograft options exist when considering labral reconstruction. The first labral reconstruction surgery was described using the ligamentum teres capitis, and has since evolved, incorporating more graft sources and reconstructive techniques. The purpose of this review is to assess and describe the different graft sources and technique currently implemented by hip surgeons. Moreover, this review attempts to determine whether a single labral reconstructive graft type is superior to the others. Techniques using the Ligamentum teres capitis autograft, ITB autograft, gracilis autograft, quadriceps tendon autograft, capsular autograft, semitendinosus allograft, indirect head of the rectus femoris autograft, peroneus brevis tendon allograft and Tensor fascia lata allograft were found. Scoring was available on 5 out of the 9 graft types. The advantages and disadvantages of each graft source is described as a comparative tool. No single graft type has shown increased benefit in acetabular labral reconstruction. The lack of uniform outcome measurements hinders comparison of reported outcomes. Surgeons should make an informed decision based on their experience as well as the patient's history and needs when choosing which graft type would be best suited for their patients.

Identifiers

PMID30647922
PMCPMC6328747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.