Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30647775›Full record

ArticleMolecular cytogenetics2019

Discrepancy of QF-PCR, CMA and karyotyping on a de novo case of mosaic isodicentric Y chromosomes.

Yuan Liu, Li Guo, Hanbiao Chen, Jian Lu, Jingjing Hu, Xianzheng Li, Xing Li, Ting Wang, Fengzhen Li, Aihua Yin

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cytogenetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yuan Liu1Prenatal Diagnosis Centre, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, 511400 Guangdong China.
Li Guo1Prenatal Diagnosis Centre, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, 511400 Guangdong China.
Hanbiao Chen1Prenatal Diagnosis Centre, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, 511400 Guangdong China.
Jian Lu1Prenatal Diagnosis Centre, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, 511400 Guangdong China.
Jingjing Hu1Prenatal Diagnosis Centre, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, 511400 Guangdong China.
Xianzheng Li1Prenatal Diagnosis Centre, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, 511400 Guangdong China.
Xing Li2Maternal and Children Metabolic-Genetic Key Laboratory, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, 511400 Guangdong China.
Ting Wang1Prenatal Diagnosis Centre, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, 511400 Guangdong China.
Fengzhen Li1Prenatal Diagnosis Centre, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, 511400 Guangdong China.
Aihua Yin1Prenatal Diagnosis Centre, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou, 511400 Guangdong China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIsodicentric chromosomes are the most frequent structural aberrations of human Y chromosome, and usually present in mosaicism with a 45, X cell line. Several cytogenetic techniques have been used for diagnosing of uncommon abnormal sex chromosome abnormalities in prenatal cases. CASE PRESENTATION: A 26-year-old healthy woman was referred to our centre at 24 weeks of gestation age. Ultrasound examination indicated she was pregnant with imbalanced development of twins. Amniocentesis was referred to the patient for further genetic analyses. Quantitative Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction (QF-PCR) indicated the existence of an extra Y chromosome or a structurally abnormal Y chromosome in primary amniotic cells. Chromosome microarray (CMA) analysis based on Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) platform was performed and identified a 10.1 Mb deletion on Y chromosome in 8-days cultured amniotic cells. Combined with the data of QF-PCR and aCGH, karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed a mosaic cell line of 45,X[27]/46,X, idic(Y)(q11.22) [14] in fetus.The karyotyping analysis of cord blood sample was consistent with amniotic cells. The parental karyotypes were normal, which indicated this mosaic case of isodicentric Y (idicY) chromosomes of the fetus was a de novo case.

conclusionSeveral approaches have been used for the detection of numerical and structural chromosomal alterations of on prenatal cases. Our report supported the essential role of incorporating multiple genetic techniques in prenatal diagnosing and genetic counseling of potential complex sex chromosomal rearrangements.

Indexed as

FISH, CMA, QF-PCRIsodicentric YKaryotypingPrenatal diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID30647775
PMCPMC6327517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.