Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30647627›Full record

ArticleJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2016

Impact of changes in fermentation time, volume of yeast, and mass of plantain pseudo-stem substrate on the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation potentials of African land snail digestive juice and yeast.

P U Amadi, M O Ifeanacho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comb spectroscopy of COBiomedical optics express · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

P U AmadiDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Port Harcourt, Choba Rivers, Nigeria.
M O IfeanachoDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Port Harcourt, Choba Rivers, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was carried out to investigate the effect of variations in mass of plantain pseudo-stem waste, volume of yeast used, and fermentation time on the product yield resulting from simultaneous saccharification and fermentation using digestive juice of African land snail and yeast. The experiment was divided into three stages which included a total of fifty seven (57) experimental setups containing sixteen (19) different combinations of the varied substrates. The results show that by varying the mass of plantain pseudo-stem waste, the production of ethanol was optimized at a mass of 250 g, which yielded 125.6 ml ± 3.5 of distillate and a percentage ethanol composition of 25.0 ± 3.6. While varying the volume of yeast used between 50 and 250 ml, with 250 g of plantain pseudo-stem waste, 250 ml of snail digestive juice and 4 g garlic for 24 h, acetic acid was detected in the setup containing 200 ml of yeast, but was not detected in similar experimental setups containing 6 g garlic. The optimum ethanol production while varying the volume of yeast slurry was recorded to be 182.3 ml ± 4.9 of distillate with 28.0% ± 1.0 ethanol composition. Variations in fermentation periods had the greatest impact on the percentage composition of ethanol and the volume of ethanol produced showing the best fermentation period for obtaining optimal ethanol production to be at 96 h. These findings show that the best specifications for the optimum production of ethanol from a 250 g of plantain pseudo-stem waste using 250 ml snail digestive, are 200 ml of yeast slurry, 6 g of garlic to ferment for a period of 96 h.

Indexed as

African land snailEthanolFermentationPlantain pseudo-stemSimultaneous saccharification

Identifiers

PMID30647627
PMCPMC6299865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.