Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30647590›Full record

ArticleJournal, genetic engineering & biotechnology2015

Identification of ISSR and RAPD markers linked to yield traits in bread wheat under normal and drought conditions.

A G A Khaled, M H Motawea, A A Said

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A G A KhaledDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Sohag University, 82786 Sohag, Egypt.
M H MotaweaDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Sohag University, Sohag 82786, Egypt.
A A SaidDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Sohag University, Sohag 82786, Egypt.
Sohag University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic variability and identification of some molecular markers were studied in twenty promising lines of wheat using agronomic traits, ISSR (inter simple sequences repeats) and RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA) markers. Significant variation was evidenced in all agronomic traits. The lines proved to be superior to the check cultivar Sahel1 in yield and its component traits. Lines L2, L7 and L8 were the best in most yield component traits in both seasons. Moreover, Lines L2, L4, L5, L7 and L8 showed drought tolerance by which they displayed high performance in agronomic traits as well as a low drought susceptibility index. The percentage of polymorphism was 39.3% and 53.2% for ISSRs and RAPDs, respectively. UBC-881 belonged to penta-nucleotide repeat sequences (GGGTG) that produced the highest level of polymorphism, while UBC-846 belonged to di-nucleotide repeat sequences (CA) that produced the lowest level of polymorphism. Genetic similarities among wheat lines based on ISSR and RAPD markers ranged from 0.81 to 1.00 and from 0.86 to 0.98, respectively. There was a low average of PIC (polymorphism information content) values which were 0.10 (ISSR) and 0.15 (RAPD). The RAPD technique exhibited a higher marker index (MI = 0.69) compared to ISSR (MI = 0.43). There was insignificant correlation between ISSR and RAPD data (0.168,

Indexed as

DroughtGenetic diversitySingle marker analysisTriticum aestivum LYield traits

Identifiers

PMID30647590
PMCPMC6299853
OpenAlexW586391691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.