Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30647461›Full record

ArticleJournal of human hypertension2019

The impact of routine follow-up with health care teams on blood pressure control among patients with hypertension.

Hui-Juan Zuo, Ji-Xiang Ma, Jin-Wen Wang, Xiao-Rong Chen, Lei Hou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Gaps in Hypertension Management in a Middle-Income Community of Quito-Ecuador: A Population-Based Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Continuity of Care and the Control of High Blood Pressure at Colombian Primary Care Services.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hui-Juan ZuoBeijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Capital Medical University, 100029, Beijing, China. huijuanzuo@sina.com.
Ji-Xiang MaDepartment of Chronic Non-communicable Diseases Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 100050, Beijing, China.
Jin-Wen WangBeijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Capital Medical University, 100029, Beijing, China.
Xiao-Rong ChenDepartment of Chronic Non-communicable Diseases Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 100050, Beijing, China.
Lei HouDepartment of Chronic Non-communicable Diseases Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 100050, Beijing, China.

Funding

CGH CDC HHS U19 GH000636
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A series of guidelines concerning hypertension emphasize the importance of follow-up in patients' management. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of routine follow-up on blood pressure (BP) control. A total of 1511 patients with hypertension aged ≥ 35 years were selected randomly from 17 communities in two cities and four townships located in Shandong and Jiangsu provinces in China. About half of the patients visited the community clinic four or more times yearly; follow-up was conducted by telephone for 43.3%. Forty-four point two percent of patients who did not visit a community clinic received telephonic follow-up; a higher percentage of telephonic follow-up was found in patients who visited community clinics frequently. Positive changes in BP level and BP control were associated with the number of clinical visits, while no significant correlations were found with telephonic follow-up. After adjustment for covariates, a higher number of clinic visits was associated with better BP control, with odds ratios of 1.628 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.141-2.322), 1.472 (95% CI: 1.008-2.271), and 1.790 (95% CI: 1.154-2.778) for 4-6, 7-12, and >12 visits/year, respectively. Taking an antihypertensive drug showed a strong, positive association with the number of clinic visits (OR 1.747, 95% CI: 1.484-2.056). These data suggest that health care systems may achieve greater success by increasing the frequency of clinical visits and that the positive changes may be related to improvement in medication adherence. Routine follow-up by telephone was not significantly associated with BP level and BP control.

Indexed as

Patient Care TeamAgedAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypertensionLogistic ModelsMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.