Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30647457›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2019

Dual RNA-seq reveals large-scale non-conserved genotype × genotype-specific genetic reprograming and molecular crosstalk in the mycorrhizal symbiosis.

Ivan D Mateus, Frédéric G Masclaux, Consolée Aletti, Edward C Rojas, Romain Savary, Cindy Dupuis, Ian R Sanders

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Differential Responses ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Synergetic effect of water deficit and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis on the expression of aquaporins in wheat (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ivan D MateusDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Biophore Building, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Frédéric G MasclauxDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Biophore Building, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Consolée AlettiDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Biophore Building, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Edward C RojasDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Biophore Building, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Romain SavaryDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Biophore Building, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Cindy DupuisDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Biophore Building, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ian R SandersDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Biophore Building, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. ian.sanders@unil.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9591-8214
University of Lausanne · CHSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) impact plant growth and are a major driver of plant diversity and productivity. We quantified the contribution of intra-specific genetic variability in cassava (Manihot esculenta) and Rhizophagus irregularis to gene reprogramming in symbioses using dual RNA-sequencing. A large number of cassava genes exhibited altered transcriptional responses to the fungus but transcription of most of these plant genes (72%) responded in a different direction or magnitude depending on the plant genotype. Two AMF isolates displayed large differences in their transcription, but the direction and magnitude of the transcriptional responses for a large number of these genes was also strongly influenced by the genotype of the plant host. This indicates that unlike the highly conserved plant genes necessary for the symbiosis establishment, most of the plant and fungal gene transcriptional responses are not conserved and are greatly influenced by plant and fungal genetic differences, even at the within-species level. The transcriptional variability detected allowed us to identify an extensive gene network showing the interplay in plant-fungal reprogramming in the symbiosis. Key genes illustrated that the two organisms jointly program their cytoskeleton organization during growth of the fungus inside roots. Our study reveals that plant and fungal genetic variation has a strong role in shaping the genetic reprograming in response to symbiosis, indicating considerable genotype × genotype interactions in the mycorrhizal symbiosis. Such variation needs to be considered in order to understand the molecular mechanisms between AMF and their plant hosts in natural communities.

Indexed as

GenotypeGlomeromycotaManihotMycorrhizaeSequence Analysis, RNASymbiosisTranscription, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID30647457
PMCPMC6474227
OpenAlexW2949917909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.