Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30647073›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2019

Accurate Estimation of Context-Dependent False Discovery Rates in Top-Down Proteomics.

Richard D LeDuc, Ryan T Fellers, Bryan P Early, Joseph B Greer, Daniel P Shams, Paul M Thomas, Neil L Kelleher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Richard D LeDucFrom the ‡Proteomics Center of Excellence, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois;. Electronic address: richard.leduc@northwestern.edu.
Ryan T FellersFrom the ‡Proteomics Center of Excellence, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Bryan P EarlyFrom the ‡Proteomics Center of Excellence, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois;; §Department of Molecular Biosciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Joseph B GreerFrom the ‡Proteomics Center of Excellence, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Daniel P Shams¶Interdisciplinary Biological Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Paul M ThomasFrom the ‡Proteomics Center of Excellence, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois;; §Department of Molecular Biosciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
Neil L KelleherFrom the ‡Proteomics Center of Excellence, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois;; §Department of Molecular Biosciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois;; Department of Chemistry and the Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. Electronic address: n-kelleher@northwestern.edu.

Funding

The UIUC Neuroproteomics Center on Cell-Cell SignalingP30DA018310 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI Elena V Romanova · 2004 to 2026
$24.9M
TR&D 7: Cell Specific ProteomicsP41GM108569 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI KELLEHER, NEIL L · 2015 to 2024
$13.6M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA018310NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM108569
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within the last several years, top-down proteomics has emerged as a high throughput technique for protein and proteoform identification. This technique has the potential to identify and characterize thousands of proteoforms within a single study, but the absence of accurate false discovery rate (FDR) estimation could hinder the adoption and consistency of top-down proteomics in the future. In automated identification and characterization of proteoforms, FDR calculation strongly depends on the context of the search. The context includes MS data quality, the database being interrogated, the search engine, and the parameters of the search. Particular to top-down proteomics-there are four molecular levels of study: proteoform spectral match (PrSM), protein, isoform, and proteoform. Here, a context-dependent framework for calculating an accurate FDR at each level was designed, implemented, and validated against a manually curated training set with 546 confirmed proteoforms. We examined several search contexts and found that an FDR calculated at the PrSM level under-reported the true FDR at the protein level by an average of 24-fold. We present a new open-source tool, the TDCD_FDR_Calculator, which provides a scalable, context-dependent FDR calculation that can be applied post-search to enhance the quality of results in top-down proteomics from any search engine.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDatabases, ProteinHumansProtein IsoformsProteomicsReproducibility of ResultsProtein IsoformsAlgorithmsAutomationFalse Discovery RateMathematical ModelingMultiple Hypothesis TestingPost-translational modifications*ProteoformStatisticsTDCD_FDR_CALCULATORTop-Down Proteomics

Identifiers

PMID30647073
PMCPMC6442365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.