Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30647046›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Screening strategies for hypertension: a systematic review protocol.

Bey-Marrié Schmidt, Solange Durão, Ingrid Toews, Charlotte M Bavuma, Joerg J Meerpohl, Tamara Kredo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Screening strategies for hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Bey-Marrié SchmidtCochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Solange DurãoCochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Ingrid ToewsInstitute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Charlotte M BavumaCollege of Medicine and Health Science, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Joerg J MeerpohlInstitute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Tamara KredoCochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
South African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Freiburg · DEUniversity of Rwanda · RW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIt is unclear whether early detection of hypertension, through screening, leads to healthier behaviours and better control of blood pressure levels. There is a need to learn from studies that have assessed the impact of different screening approaches on patient important outcomes. This systematic review protocol outlines the methods that will be used to assess the comparative effectiveness of different screening strategies (mass, targeted or opportunistic) for hypertension to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with hypertension. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will primarily search Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Embase and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS). Relevant randomised controlled trials, controlled before and after, interrupted time series and prospective analytic cohort studies regardless of publication date, language and geographic location, will be included. We are interested in clinical, adverse event and health system outcomes. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts and full-text articles against inclusion criteria; perform data extraction and assess risk of bias in included studies. We will assess the certainty of the overall evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach and report findings accordingly. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics approval will be sought, as only secondary studies will be used. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018093046.

Indexed as

HumansHypertensionMass ScreeningResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as Topichypertensionmass screeningopportunistic screeningtargeted screening

Identifiers

PMID30647046
PMCPMC6340413
OpenAlexW2908814590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.