ArticleBMJ open2019
Qualitative study investigating the underlying motivations of healthy participants in phase I clinical trials.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Trial
- More than a moment: Evolving decisions among eligible volunteers in phase 1 COVID-19 vaccine trials.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- How to Optimize Healthy Volunteer Screening and Enrolment in Clinical Trials: A Qualitative and Quantitative Approach to Evaluate Processes and Healthy Volunteers' Perceptions.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Understanding recruitment challenges in Swiss oncology trials: Patient voices from focus groups.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2026Article
- Why do healthy volunteers participate in clinical trials?British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthy volunteer motivations: a mixed-methods study of participants in plague vaccine trials in the UK and Uganda.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Vietnamese University Students' Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Participation in Clinical Research: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2026Article
- Assessment of Participant Satisfaction and Overall Experience: A Cross-Sectional Survey to Inform Trial Conduct.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Smart Blister System with and without Mobile App Support: A Randomized Controlled Usability Trial.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- "Stories like ours continue": A phenomenological exploration of the lived experiences of ex-serial clinical trial volunteers in South India.Dialogues in health · 2025Article
- Comparison of the characteristics of healthy volunteers participating in Phase 1 clinical trials in Korea and Japan.Translational and clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
- Public Perception of Clinical Trials and Its Predictors Among Polish Adults.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical Trial Participation Motivation: Role of Smoking Status.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of factors associated with recruitment rates in early phase clinical trials based on the European Clinical Trials Register data.Clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- The ethical anatomy of payment for research participants.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2022Article
- Patient perspectives on window of opportunity clinical trials in early-stage breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022Article
- Behavioural approaches to recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a systematic mapping review.BMJ open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIf patients are to reap the benefits of continued drug development, an understanding of why healthy participants take part in phase I clinical trials is imperative. The current study aimed to explore the nature of these underlying motivations which may, in turn, improve the overall participant experience and assist in the development of more effective recruitment and retention strategies.
designThis study used a qualitative design based on the theory of planned behaviour. Specifically, it explored healthy participants' underlying behavioural, control and normative beliefs which influence their participation in phase I clinical trials.
settingThis study took place at a company that specialises in conducting phase I and phase II clinical trials in the Australian state of Queensland.
participantsParticipants (n=31) were either currently undergoing a phase I clinical trial or had previously taken part in a phase I clinical trial.
resultsResults showed that the motivations were varied and not solely centred on financial gains. Reported advantages of participation included altruism, while inconvenience was most often reported as a disadvantage. Friends were reported as those most likely to approve, while one's mother was reported as most likely to disapprove. Having a suitable time frame/flexible scheduling and feeling comfortable taking part in the trial were both the most commonly reported facilitators, while inflexible scheduling/time commitment was the most commonly reported barrier.
conclusionsPractical implications included the need for organisations involved in clinical trials to be mindful of inflexible scheduling and exploring the possibility of making educational materials available to family members who may be concerned about the risks associated with participation. Overall, it is anticipated that the results of this study will improve the understanding of factors that influence phase I clinical trial participation which may, ultimately, help develop new therapeutics to improve patient health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.