ArticleParasites & vectors2019
Wolbachia introduction into Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae) cell lines and its effects on immune-related gene expression and interaction with Leishmania infantum.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Natural Infection by Toscana Virus and Other Phleboviruses in Wild Sand Flies From Spain: Prevalence, Genetic Characterization and Tripartite Interactions With Leishmania infantum and Wolbachia.Zoonoses and public health · 2026Article
- First record of Phlebotomus sergenti (Diptera: Psychodidae) in China and its potential epidemiological implications.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Wolbachia in natural sand fly (diptera: psychodidae) populations from Türkiye and its potential role in mitochondrial divergence.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Impact of Asaia bacteria on Leishmania major development in sand flies: implications for vector control strategies.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Assessing Wolbachia circulation in wild populations of phlebotomine sand flies from Spain and Morocco: implications for control of leishmaniasis.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Stability and suitability of housekeeping genes in phlebotomine sand flies.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Microbial ecology of sandflies-the correlation between nutrition,Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Effects of host species on microbiota composition in Phlebotomus and Lutzomyia sand flies.Parasites & vectors · 2023Article
- Biotechnological Potential of Microorganisms for Mosquito Population Control and Reduction in Vector Competence.Insects · 2023Review
- Beyond canonical models: why a broader understanding of Diptera-microbiota interactions is essential for vector-borne disease control.Evolutionary ecology · 2023Article
- Evidence of a conserved mammalian immunosuppression mechanism inFrontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Host-Parasite Interactions: Regulation of Leishmania Infection in Sand Fly.Acta parasitologica · 2022Review
- Overview of paratransgenesis as a strategy to control pathogen transmission by insect vectors.Parasites & vectors · 2022Review
- Molecular phylogeny of heritable symbionts and microbiota diversity analysis in phlebotominae sand flies and Culex nigripalpus from Colombia.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- Isolation in Natural Host Cell Lines ofInsects · 2021Article
- Growth and Maintenance ofInsects · 2021Review
- Towards a Sustainable Vector-Control Strategy in the Post Kala-Azar Elimination Era.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Review
- The effect of the endosymbiont Wolbachia on the behavior of insect hosts.Insect science · 2020Review
- Insights into the proteomic profile and gene expression of Lutzomyia longipalpis-derived Lulo cell line.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2020Article
- Wild specimens of sand fly phlebotomine Lutzomyia evansi, vector of leishmaniasis, show high abundance of Methylobacterium and natural carriage of Wolbachia and Cardinium types in the midgut microbiome.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe leishmaniases are important neglected diseases caused by Leishmania spp. which are transmitted by sand flies, Lutzomyia longipalpis being the main vector of visceral leishmaniasis in the Americas. The methodologies for leishmaniasis control are not efficient, causing 1.5 million reported cases annually worldwide, therefore showing the need for development of novel strategies and interventions to control transmission of the disease. The bacterium Wolbachia pipientis is being used to control viruses transmitted by mosquitoes, such as dengue and Zika, and its introduction in disease vectors has been effective against parasites such as Plasmodium. Here we show the first successful establishment of Wolbachia into two different embryonic cell lines from L. longipalpis, LL-5 and Lulo, and analysed its effects on the sand fly innate immune system, followed by in vitro Leishmania infantum interaction.
resultsOur results show that LL-5 cells respond to wMel and wMelPop-CLA strains within the first 72 h post-infection, through the expression of antimicrobial peptides and inducible nitric oxide synthase resulting in a decrease of Wolbachia detection in the early stages of infection. In subsequent passages, the wMel strain was not able to infect any of the sand fly cell lines while the wMelPop-CLA strain was able to stably infect Lulo cells and LL-5 at lower levels. In Wolbachia stably infected cells, the expression of immune-related genes involved with downregulation of the IMD, Toll and Jak-Stat innate immune pathways was significantly decreased, in comparison with the uninfected control, suggesting immune activation upon Wolbachia transinfection. Furthermore, Wolbachia transinfection did not promote a negative effect on parasite load in those cells.
conclusionsInitial strong immune responses of LL5 cells might explain the inefficiency of stable infections in these cells while we found that Lulo cells are more permissive to infection with Wolbachia causing an effect on the cell immune system, but not against in vitro L. infantum interaction. This establishes Lulo cells as a good system for the adaptation of Wolbachia in L. longipalpis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.