Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30646849›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2019

Trends in antimicrobial management of gonorrhoea by general practitioners in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, between 2010 and 2016: a cross-sectional study.

Roos van Amerongen, Roel P Gazendam, Jan E A M van Bergen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roos van AmerongenDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. rsvanamerongen@gmail.nl.
Roel P GazendamDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan E A M van BergenDepartment of General Practice, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, P.O. Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NLNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSexually transmitted infections (STI) caused by multidrug resistant Neisseria gonorrhoea are an emerging threat to global health. In the Netherlands, the general practitioner (GP) provides the major part of STI care. In 2013 an update of the Dutch guideline was published, recommending a single dose of intramuscular ceftriaxone as treatment for gonorrhoea infections. Data from a Dutch General Practitioner research database was used to investigate the guideline implementation for the treatment of gonorrhoea. A survey was conducted to gain more insight in GPs experiences with the recommended intramuscular therapy.

methodsData on STI-related episodes and STI-diagnoses for gonorrhoea, based on ICPC codes were obtained from the electronic medical records (EMRs) from 35 GPs in Amsterdam for the years 2010 to 2016. Questionnaires regarding the treatment preferences were sent to GPs participating in the research network database.

resultsThe number of gonorrhoea cases treated with first choice therapy increased from 81% in 2010 (intramuscular cefotaxime or ceftriaxone) to 93% in 2015 (only cefttriaxone). The number of ceftriaxone prescriptions increased substantially from 30% in 2010 to 93% in 2015. GPs preferred a single intramuscular shot of a third-generation cephalosporin above multiple oral doses of other antibiotics.

conclusionsThe results demonstrate a successful shift in the antimicrobial management of gonorrhoea infections to ceftriaxone monotherapy according to the national guideline. GPs in this higher prevalence area in Amsterdam reported limited barriers in the intramuscular administration of third-generation cephalosporins.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefotaximeCeftriaxoneCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeneral PractitionersGonorrheaHumansInjections, IntramuscularMaleNetherlandsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Young AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefotaximeCeftriaxoneAntimicrobial managementCeftriaxoneGeneral practiceGonorrhoeaResistance

Identifiers

PMID30646849
PMCPMC6332518
OpenAlexW2911590648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.