Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30646847›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2019

Assessing quality indicators related to mental health emergency room utilization.

Marie-Josée Fleury, Marilyn Fortin, Louis Rochette, Guy Grenier, Christophe Huỳnh, Éric Pelletier, Helen-Maria Vasiliadis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Emergency Department Use among Patients with Mental Health Problems: Profiles, Correlates, and Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Profiles of Emergency Department Users with Psychiatric Disorders Related to Barriers to Outpatient Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Predictors of Frequent Emergency Department Utilization for Mental Health Reasons.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marie-Josée FleuryDepartment of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. flemar@douglas.mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-4743-8611
Marilyn FortinDouglas Mental Health University Institute Research Centre, 6875 LaSalle Blvd., Montreal, QC, H4H 1R3, Canada.
Louis RochetteQuebec National Institute of Public Health, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Guy GrenierDouglas Mental Health University Institute Research Centre, 6875 LaSalle Blvd., Montreal, QC, H4H 1R3, Canada.
Christophe HuỳnhCentre de recherche et d'expertise en dépendance, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Éric PelletierQuebec National Institute of Public Health, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Helen-Maria VasiliadisDépartement des sciences de la santé communautaires, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis descriptive study compared 2014-15 to 2005-06 data on the quality of mental health services (MHS) in relation to emergency room (ER) use to assess the impact of the 2005 Quebec MH reform regarding access, continuity and appropriateness of care for patients with mental illnesses (PMI).

methodsData emanated from the Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System (Quebec/Canada). Participants (865,255 for 2014-15; 817,395 for 2005-06) were age 12 or over, with at least one MI, including substance use disorders (SUD), diagnosed during an ER visit, outpatient treatment or hospitalization. Variables included: access (ER use/frequency, hospitalization rates, outpatient consultations preceding an ER visit), care continuity (outpatient consultations following an ER visit/hospitalization, consecutive returns to the ERs), and care appropriateness (high ER use, recurrence of yearly ER visits, length of hospitalization). Frequency distributions were calculated on sex, age and geographic area for ER visits/hospitalizations in 2014-15, and between 2014 and 15 and 2005-06.

resultsPMI accounted for 12 % of the Quebec population in 2014-15 (n = 865,255), of whom 39% visited an ER for any reason. Amount and frequency of ER use and number/length of hospitalizations were almost twice as high for PMI versus patients without MI; 17% of PMI were also high/very high ER users and were frequently hospitalized. Among PMI, ER users were also frequent users of outpatient services despite a lack of follow-up appointments after ER visits or hospitalizations. Findings revealed some positive changes over time, such as decreased ER and hospitalization rates; yet overall access, continuity and appropriateness of care, as measured in this study, remained low.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated that the Quebec reform did not produce a substantial impact on ER use or substantially improved care, as hypothesized. Better access and continuity of care should be promoted to reduce the high prevalence of ER use among PMI. Quality improvement in MHS may be realized if ERs are supported by substantial and well-integrated community MH networks.

Indexed as

Quality Indicators, Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedAmbulatory CareChildContinuity of Patient CareEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHealth Care ReformHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLength of StayMaleMental DisordersMental Health ServicesAccess to careAppropriateness of careContinuity of careEmergency roomMental illnessQuality indicatorsQuality of mental health services

Identifiers

PMID30646847
PMCPMC6332534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.