Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30646486›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurogastroenterology and motility2019

Differential Effects of

Shanbin Chen, Yangwenshan Ou, Liang Zhao, Yang Li, Zhenxing Qiao, Yanling Hao, Fazheng Ren

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06432608 (Single Arm Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Lacticaseibacillus Paracasei Strain Shirota), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06432608 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Single Arm Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Lacticaseibacillus Paracasei Strain Shirota (Formerly Lactobacillus Casei Strain Shirota) Fermented Milk (Yakult®) on the Maintenance of Clinical Manifestations of Functional Constipation in Mexican Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of GuadalajaraRan2024 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsConstipationArmsfermented milk, Yakult
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Evaluating the Effect ofNutrients · 2024
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Acupoint Massage Therapy Alters the Composition of Gut Microbiome in Functional Constipation Patients.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Article
  18. Stool Consistency: Looking Beyond the Bristol Stool Form Scale.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shanbin ChenBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Yangwenshan OuBeijing Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety, Beijing, China.
Liang ZhaoBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Yang LiScience and Public Relations Office, Yakult (China) Corporation, Shanghai, China.
Zhenxing QiaoScience and Public Relations Office, Yakult (China) Corporation, Shanghai, China.
Yanling HaoBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Fazheng RenBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, College of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
China Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsProbiotics are expected to confer benefits on patients with constipation, but how probiotics act on constipated patients with variable stool consistencies remains unclear. We investigated the effect of

methodsConstipated patients meeting the Rome III criteria were divided into 3 groups according to the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS): hard (hard stool [HS], BSFS < 3), normal (normal stool [NS], ≤ 3 BSFS ≤ 4), and soft (soft stool [SS], 4 < BSFS ≤ 5) stools. Subjects in each group consumed a probiotic beverage containing 10¹⁰ colony-forming units of LcS daily for 28 days.

resultsLcS intervention significantly alleviated constipation-related symptoms and increased defecation frequency in all subjects. Four weeks of LcS supplementation softened the hard stools in HS, hardened the soft stools in SS, and did not alter the ideal stool consistency in NS. The short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations were highest in SS, followed by NS and HS. LcS intervention increased the stool SCFA levels in HS but reduced or did not alter the levels in NS and SS. LcS intervention increased the

conclusionsLcS supplementation improved the constipation-related symptoms in constipated subjects. Differences in baseline stool consistency could result in different anti-constipation effects of LcS intervention. LcS balanced the stool consistency-softened the HS and hardened the SS. These effects could be associated with modulation of the gut microbiota and SCFA production.

Indexed as

ConstipationFatty acids, volatileGastrointestinal microbiomeLactobacillus casei

Identifiers

PMID30646486
PMCPMC6326197
OpenAlexW2910282186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.