ArticleJAMA network open2018
Prevalence of and Factors Associated With Patient Nondisclosure of Medically Relevant Information to Clinicians.
Article in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04803448 (Patient Doctor Lies), which is not on this map. Cited by 79 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Patient Doctor Lies: When is Privacy Assurance a Bad Thing? A Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
79 citing papers in PubMed, 154 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acceptability of Long Versus Short Firearm Safety Education Videos in the Emergency Department: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Annals of emergency medicine · 2023Trial
- Hepatitis C screening strategies and linkage-to-care approaches in U.S. emergency departments: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Review
- Who Should Address Healthcare Institutional Betrayal and How? An Experimental Study of Repair Strategies.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Measuring the Impact of Humanistic Care: A Six-Item Scale to Enhance Patient Trust.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
- Medication Discrepancy in the Hospital-to-Home Transition Period of Elderly Chinese Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: A Qualitative Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- From reporting to relating: Reimagining ePROMs in cancer symptom management.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2026Article
- 'Trust me, I'm a Doctor': examining the influence of threat perceptions, stigma, emotion, and distrust on reproductive health data falsification.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Community-academic implementation science partnership to examine adoption and impact of a patient-centered approach to sexual history.Psychological services · 2025Article
- Impact of coronary artery calcium scores on cardiovascular risk and preventive therapies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Global cardiology science & practice · 2025Review
- Assessing the Prevalence of Depression Among English- and Spanish-Speaking Patients at a Free Medical Clinic.Cureus · 2025Article
- Suboptimal methotrexate utilization in Chinese patients with inflammatory arthritis: data from a Chinese center.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- Policy implications of physicians' attitudes towards being examined by medical students.Israel journal of health policy research · 2025Article
- Engagement and attrition in digital mental health: current challenges and potential solutions.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Aluminum phosphide poisoning with Brugada ECG: a case report highlighting diagnostic challenges arising from patient nondisclosure.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Factors associated with unvoiced concerns of patients attributed to embarrassment, modesty or a fear of being judged.BMC primary care · 2025Observational
- Review
- Maternal Phenylketonuria: Consequences of Dietary Non-Adherence and Gaps in Preconception Care-A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Updating the Definition for Humanism in Healthcare: Kind, Safe, and Trustworthy.Journal of patient experience · 2025Article
- Healthcare needs and barriers to care among female partners of male suspects of child sexual abuse material offences in Sweden: a qualitative interview study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Risk assessment of patients with underlying health conditions who present for IVF treatment.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Review
19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Patient failure to disclose medically relevant information to clinicians can undermine patient care or even lead to patient harm. Objective: To examine the frequency of patients failing to disclose to their clinicians information that is relevant to their care and their reasons for doing so. Design, Setting, and Participants: Two national nonprobability samples were recruited to participate in an online survey, one using Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk) from March 16 to 30, 2015 (2096 respondents), followed by one using Survey Sampling International (SSI) from November 6 to 17, 2015 (3011 respondents). Data analysis was conducted from September 28 to October 8, 2018. After dropping respondents meeting the exclusion criteria, the final sample sizes were 2011 (MTurk) and 2499 (SSI). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measures were self-reported nondisclosure of 7 types of information to their clinician (eg, did not understand instructions, medication use) and reasons for nondisclosure (eg, embarrassment, not wanting to be judged). Results: There was a total of 4510 overall respondents. Of 2096 respondents, 2013 completed the MTurk survey (96.0% completion rate) and 2011 were included in the analysis. Of 3011 respondents, 2685 completed the SSI survey (89.2% completion rate) and 2499 were included in the analysis. The mean (SD) age of the participants was 36 (12.4) years for MTurk and 61 (7.59) years for SSI. Both samples were predominantly white (MTurk: 1696 [84.3%]; SSI: 1968 [78.8%]). A total of 1630 MTurk participants (81.1%) and 1535 SSI participants (61.4%) avoided disclosing at least 1 type of information. Disagreeing with the clinician's recommendation (MTurk: 918 of 2010 respondents [45.7%]; SSI: 785 of 2497 respondents [31.4%]) and not understanding the clinician's instructions (MTurk: 638 of 2009 respondents [31.8%]; SSI: 607 of 2497 respondents [24.3%]) were the most common occurrences. The most commonly reported reasons for nondisclosure included not wanting to be judged or lectured (MTurk: 81.8% [95% CI, 79.8%-83.9%]; SSI: 64.1% [95% CI, 61.5%-66.7%]), not wanting to hear how harmful the behavior is (MTurk: 75.7% [95% CI, 73.5%-78.0%]; SSI: 61.1% [95% CI, 58.5%-63.8%]), and being embarrassed (MTurk: 60.9% [95% CI, 58.9%-62.9%]; SSI: 49.9% [95% CI, 47.8%-52.1%]). In both samples, participants who were women (MTurk: odds ratio [OR], 1.88 [95% CI, 1.49-2.37]; SSI: OR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.17-1.64]), younger (MTurk: OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-0.99]; SSI: OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-0.99]), and with worse self-rated health (MTurk: OR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.76-0.99]; SSI: OR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.72-0.88]) were more likely to report withholding information. Conclusions and Relevance: Many respondents in these surveys intentionally withhold important information from their clinicians and were most likely to do so when they disagreed with or misunderstood their clinician's instructions. A better understanding of how to increase patients' comfort with reporting this information may improve the clinician-patient relationship and patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.