Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30646396›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2018

Assessment of Safety and Outcome of Lateral Hypothalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Obesity in a Small Series of Patients With Prader-Willi Syndrome.

Ruth R Franco, Erich T Fonoff, Pedro G Alvarenga, Eduardo J L Alho, Antonio Carlos Lopes, Marcelo Q Hoexter, Marcelo C Batistuzzo, Raquel R Paiva, Anita Taub, Roseli G Shavitt and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Hypothalamic syndrome.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Electroceuticals in the Gastrointestinal Tract.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ruth R FrancoChildren's Institute, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Erich T FonoffDivision of Functional Neurosurgery of Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Pedro G AlvarengaInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo J L AlhoDivision of Functional Neurosurgery of Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Antonio Carlos LopesInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo Q HoexterInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo C BatistuzzoInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Raquel R PaivaInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Anita TaubInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Roseli G ShavittInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Euripides C MiguelInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Manoel J TeixeiraDivision of Functional Neurosurgery of Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Durval DamianiChildren's Institute, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Clement HamaniDivision of Functional Neurosurgery of Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been investigated for treatment of morbid obesity with variable results. Patients with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) present with obesity that is often difficult to treat. Objective: To test the safety and study the outcome of DBS in patients with PWS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case series was conducted in the Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, Brazil. Four patients with genetically confirmed PWS presenting with severe obesity were included. Exposure: Deep brain stimulation electrodes were bilaterally implanted in the lateral hypothalamic area. After DBS implantation, the treatment included the following phases: titration (1-2 months), stimulation off (2 months), low-frequency DBS (40 Hz; 1 month), washout (15 days), high-frequency DBS (130 Hz; 1 month), and long-term follow-up (6 months). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome measures were adverse events recorded during stimulation and long-term DBS treatment. Secondary outcomes consisted of changes in anthropometric measures (weight, body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared], and abdominal and neck circumference), bioimpedanciometry, and calorimetry after 6 months of treatment compared with baseline. The following evaluations and measurements were conducted before and after DBS: clinical, neurological, psychiatric, neuropsychological, anthropometry, calorimetry, blood workup, hormonal levels, and sleep studies. Adverse effects were monitored during all follow-up visits. Results: Four patients with PWS were included (2 male and 2 female; ages 18-28 years). Baseline mean (SD) body mass index was 39.6 (11.1). Two patients had previous bariatric surgery, and all presented with psychiatric comorbidity, which was well controlled with the use of medications. At 6 months after long-term DBS, patients had a mean 9.6% increase in weight, 5.8% increase in body mass index, 8.4% increase in abdominal circumference, 4.2% increase in neck circumference, 5.3% increase in the percentage of body fat, and 0% change in calorimetry compared with baseline. Also unchanged were hormonal levels and results of blood workup, sleep studies, and neuropsychological evaluations. Two patients developed stimulation-induced manic symptoms. Discontinuation of DBS controlled this symptom in 1 patient. The other required adjustments in medication dosage. Two infections were documented, 1 associated with skin picking. Conclusions and Relevance: Safety of lateral hypothalamic area stimulation was in the range of that demonstrated in patients with similar psychiatric conditions receiving DBS. In the small cohort of patients with PWS treated in our study, DBS was largely ineffective.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansHypothalamusMaleObesity, MorbidPrader-Willi SyndromeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30646396
PMCPMC6324383
OpenAlexW2902748533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.