Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30646298›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2018

Comparison of Nicotine and Toxicant Exposure in Users of Electronic Cigarettes and Combustible Cigarettes.

Maciej L Goniewicz, Danielle M Smith, Kathryn C Edwards, Benjamin C Blount, Kathleen L Caldwell, Jun Feng, Lanqing Wang, Carol Christensen, Bridget Ambrose, Nicolette Borek and 12 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 349 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
349citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
33.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

349 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 531 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Birth outcomes following intrauterine exposure to electronic nicotine delivery systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A systematic review and meta-analysis of e-cigarette use among cancer survivors.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Exposure to Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamines Among People Who Vape, Smoke, or do Neither: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pulmonary effects of e-liquid flavors: a systematic review.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Identifying Promising Message Themes for Youth Who Use Multiple Tobacco Products.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2025
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Effects of Modified Risk Tobacco Product Claims on Consumer Responses.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Trial
  20. Trial

289 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Maciej L GoniewiczDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Danielle M SmithDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Kathryn C EdwardsWestat, Rockville, Maryland.
Benjamin C BlountTobacco and Volatiles Branch, Division of Laboratory Sciences, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Kathleen L CaldwellTobacco and Volatiles Branch, Division of Laboratory Sciences, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jun FengTobacco and Volatiles Branch, Division of Laboratory Sciences, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Lanqing WangTobacco and Volatiles Branch, Division of Laboratory Sciences, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Carol ChristensenOffice of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Bridget AmbroseOffice of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Nicolette BorekOffice of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Dana van BemmelOffice of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Karen KonkelOffice of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Gladys ErivesOffice of Science, Center for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Cassandra A StantonWestat, Rockville, Maryland.
Elizabeth LambertNational Institute of Drug Abuse, Bethesda, Maryland.
Heather L KimmelNational Institute of Drug Abuse, Bethesda, Maryland.
Dorothy HatsukamiMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Stephen S HechtMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Raymond S NiauraThe Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Truth Initiative, Washington, DC.
Mark TraversDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Charles LawrenceWestat, Rockville, Maryland.
Andrew J HylandDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Office of Science · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USWestat (United States) · USNational Institute on Drug Abuse · USUniversity of Minnesota · USAmerican Legacy Foundation · US

Funding

NIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201100027CNIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201600001C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) is increasing. Measures of exposure to known tobacco-related toxicants among e-cigarette users will inform potential health risks to individual product users. Objectives: To estimate concentrations of tobacco-related toxicants among e-cigarette users and compare these biomarker concentrations with those observed in combustible cigarette users, dual users, and never tobacco users. Design, Setting, and Participants: A population-based, longitudinal cohort study was conducted in the United States in 2013-2014. Cross-sectional analysis was performed between November 4, 2016, and October 5, 2017, of biomarkers of exposure to tobacco-related toxicants collected by the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Participants included adults who provided a urine sample and data on tobacco use (N = 5105). Exposures: The primary exposure was tobacco use, including current exclusive e-cigarette users (n = 247), current exclusive cigarette smokers (n = 2411), and users of both products (dual users) (n = 792) compared with never tobacco users (n = 1655). Main Outcomes and Measures: Geometric mean concentrations of 50 individual biomarkers from 5 major classes of tobacco product constituents were measured: nicotine, tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs), metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Results: Of the 5105 participants, most were aged 35 to 54 years (weighted percentage, 38%; 95% CI, 35%-40%), women (60%; 95% CI, 59%-62%), and non-Hispanic white (61%; 95% CI, 58%-64%). Compared with exclusive e-cigarette users, never users had 19% to 81% significantly lower concentrations of biomarkers of exposure to nicotine, TSNAs, some metals (eg, cadmium and lead), and some VOCs (including acrylonitrile). Exclusive e-cigarette users showed 10% to 98% significantly lower concentrations of biomarkers of exposure, including TSNAs, PAHs, most VOCs, and nicotine, compared with exclusive cigarette smokers; concentrations were comparable for metals and 3 VOCs. Exclusive cigarette users showed 10% to 36% lower concentrations of several biomarkers than dual users. Frequency of cigarette use among dual users was positively correlated with nicotine and toxicant exposure. Conclusions and Relevance: Exclusive use of e-cigarettes appears to result in measurable exposure to known tobacco-related toxicants, generally at lower levels than cigarette smoking. Toxicant exposure is greatest among dual users, and frequency of combustible cigarette use is positively correlated with tobacco toxicant concentration. These findings provide evidence that using combusted tobacco cigarettes alone or in combination with e-cigarettes is associated with higher concentrations of potentially harmful tobacco constituents in comparison with using e-cigarettes alone.

Indexed as

SmokingVapingAdultBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInhalation ExposureMaleMetalsMiddle AgedNicotineNitrosaminesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsUnited StatesBiomarkersMetalsNicotineNitrosaminesPolycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Identifiers

PMID30646298
PMCPMC6324349
OpenAlexW2904941043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.