ArticleJAMA network open2018
Toward a More Nuanced Approach to the Early Administration of Intravenous Fluids in Patients With Sepsis.
Article in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Association Between Time to Completion of at Least 30 mL/kg and Hospital Outcomes Among Patients With Septic Shock.Critical care explorations · 2025Article
- Nomogram for Risk Prediction of Mortality for Patients with Critical Cardiovascular Disease Treated by Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Coronary Care Unit.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Association Between Implementation of the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle Performance Measure and Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Sepsis in US Hospitals.JAMA network open · 2021Observational
- An Evaluation of the Use of Aggressive Fluid Resuscitation in the Early Treatment of Sepsis Patients.Cureus · 2021Article
- Efficacy and prognosis of continuous renal replacement therapy at different times in the treatment of patients with sepsis-induced acute kidney injury.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30646288What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.