Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30646281›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2018

Effect of a Fracture Liaison Service on the Rate of Subsequent Fracture Among Patients With a Fragility Fracture in the Norwegian Capture the Fracture Initiative (NoFRACT): A Trial Protocol.

Camilla Andreasen, Lene B Solberg, Trude Basso, Tove T Borgen, Cecilie Dahl, Torbjørn Wisløff, Gunhild Hagen, Ellen M Apalset, Jan-Erik Gjertsen, Wender Figved and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02536898 (Norwegian Capture the Fracture Initiative), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02536898 nacompletednot on this map

Norwegian Capture the Fracture Initiative

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2015 to 2020Enrolled94,260ConditionsHip Fracture, Vertebral Fracture, Other Low-trauma FractureArmsFracture Liaison Service, Current treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fracture liaison service (FLS) is associated with lower subsequent fragility fracture risk and mortality: NoFRACT (the Norwegian capture the fracture initiative).Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Adherence to secondary fracture prevention is associated with reduced risk of subsequent fractures.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The hip fracture incidence in the high-risk area Oslo continues to decline.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Characterization of fracture liaison service non-responders after invitation by home visits and questionnaires.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Determinants of trabecular bone score and prevalent vertebral fractures in women with fragility fractures: a cross-sectional sub-study of NoFRACT.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Camilla AndreasenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Lene B SolbergDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Trude BassoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, St Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Tove T BorgenDepartment of Rheumatology, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Hospital of Drammen, Drammen, Norway.
Cecilie DahlDepartment of Community Medicine and Global Health, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Torbjørn WisløffDepartment of Community Medicine and Global Health, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Gunhild HagenDepartment of Reviews and Health Technology Assessments, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Ellen M ApalsetBergen Group of Epidemiology and Biomarkers in Rheumatic Disease, Department of Rheumatology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Jan-Erik GjertsenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Wender FigvedDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Bærum Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Bærum, Norway.
Lars M HübschleDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Hospital of Drammen, Drammen, Norway.
Jens M StutzerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Molde Hospital, Molde, Norway.
Jan ElvenesDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Ragnar M JoakimsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Unni SyversenDepartment of Endocrinology, St Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Erik F EriksenDepartment of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Lars NordslettenDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Frede FrihagenDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Tone K OmslandDepartment of Community Medicine and Global Health, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Åshild BjørneremDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NOVestre Viken Hospital Trust · NOUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NOMolde Hospital · NONorwegian Institute of Public Health · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOSt Olav's University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Fragility fracture is a major health issue because of the accompanying morbidity, mortality, and financial cost. Despite the high cost to society and personal cost to affected individuals, secondary fracture prevention is suboptimal in Norway, mainly because most patients with osteoporotic fractures do not receive treatment with antiosteoporotic drugs after fracture repair. Objectives: To improve secondary fracture prevention by introducing a standardized intervention program and to investigate the effect of the program on the rate of subsequent fractures. Design, Setting, and Participants: Trial protocol of the Norwegian Capture the Fracture Initiative (NoFRACT), an ongoing, stepped wedge cluster randomized clinical trial in 7 hospitals in Norway. The participating hospitals were cluster randomized to an intervention starting date: May 1, 2015; September 1, 2015; and January 1, 2016. Follow-up is through December 31, 2019. The outcome data were merged from national registries of women and men 50 years and older with a recent fragility fracture treated at 1 of the 7 hospitals. Discussion: The NoFRACT trial is intended to enroll 82 000 patients (intervention period, 26 000 patients; control period, 56 000 patients), of whom 23 578 are currently enrolled by January 2018. Interventions include a standardized program for identification, assessment, and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with a fragility fracture that is led by a trained coordinating nurse. The primary outcome is rate of subsequent fracture (per 10 000 person-years) based on national registry data. Outcomes before (2008-2015; control period) and after (2015-2019; intervention period) the intervention will be compared, and each hospital will act as its own control. Use of outcomes from national registry data means that all patients are included in the analysis regardless of whether they are exposed to the intervention (intention to treat). A sensitivity analysis with a transition window will be performed to mitigate possible within-cluster contamination. Results: Results are planned to be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and presented at local, national, and international conferences. Conclusions: By introducing a standardized intervention program for assessment and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures, we expect to document reduced rates of subsequent fractures and fracture-related mortality. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02536898.

Indexed as

Osteoporotic FracturesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayOsteoporosisResearch DesignSecondary Prevention

Identifiers

PMID30646281
PMCPMC6324344
OpenAlexW2905577176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.