Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30646224›Full record

Observational studyJAMA network open2018

Assessment of Nuclear ZEB2 as a Biomarker for Colorectal Cancer Outcome and TNM Risk Stratification.

Rahul Sreekumar, Scott Harris, Karwan Moutasim, Ricardo DeMateos, Ashish Patel, Katherine Emo, Sophie White, Tamer Yagci, Eugene Tulchinsky, Gareth Thomas and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Role of Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. The Roles of Zinc Finger Proteins in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Biomedicines · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A pre-existing population of ZEB2Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Rahul SreekumarCancer Sciences Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Scott HarrisMedical Statistics and Mathematics Department, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Karwan MoutasimCancer Sciences Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Ricardo DeMateosDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ashish PatelCancer Sciences Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Katherine EmoCancer Sciences Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Sophie WhiteDepartment of Surgery, Southampton University Hospital National Health Service Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Tamer YagciDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Gebze Technical University, Gebze, Turkey.
Eugene TulchinskyDepartment of Cancer Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Gareth ThomasCancer Sciences Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
John N PrimroseCancer Sciences Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
A Emre SayanCancer Sciences Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Alex H MirnezamiCancer Sciences Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
University of Southampton · GBNational Health Service · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBGebze Technical University · TRHarvard University · USUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK C28503/A10013Medical Research Council MR/L017539/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: At present, patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) are risk stratified using TNM histologic features. More recently, an association between a mesenchymal phenotype and a high risk of disease recurrence and micrometastases has been recognized. Objective: To investigate the association of the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT)-inducing transcription factor ZEB2 (zinc finger E box-binding homeobox 2), survival outcomes, and the efficacy of ZEB2 as a biomarker when added as refinement to TNM staging after curative intent surgery for CRC. Design, Setting, and Participants: ZEB2 expression was assessed using a previously validated scoring system as part of a prospective, observational, masked diagnostic study from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2013. Data were prospectively collected and analyzed for association with oncologic outcomes from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018. An initial test cohort from an academic university medical center of 126 consecutive patients with CRC and, subsequently, an independent validation cohort of 210 patients were examined. ZEB2 positivity was scored by 2 independent, masked pathologists. External validity was tested using an open access gene expression portal. Nomograms were developed with or without ZEB2. Main Outcomes and Measures: Systemic and local recurrence of CRC. Results: The test cohort consisted of 126 consecutive patients (mean [SD] age, 72.7 [11.7] years; 61 [48.4%] male) and the validation cohort of 210 patients (mean [SD] age, 72.0 [10.6] years; 111 [52.9%] male). A total of 52 tumors (41.3%) in the test cohort and 104 (49.5%) in the validation cohort were scored nuclear ZEB2 positive. Survival analysis by the log-rank test found that ZEB2 expression was associated with a significant reduction in overall survival and disease-free survival in both cohorts. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis highlighted ZEB2 as an independent biomarker of shorter overall survival and disease-free survival. Analysis of node-negative disease (n = 222) identified ZEB2 as an independent biomarker of early recurrence and reduced survival. External validation confirmed these findings. Addition of ZEB2 expression to nomograms composed of conventional TNM risk factors improved the ability to identify patients at high risk of recurrence demonstrated by the improvement in concordance index in both test (0.73 to 0.77) and validation (0.82 to 0.87) cohorts. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that expression of ZEB2 is associated with poor oncologic outcome and distant recurrence. The study also found that the addition of ZEB2 to existing TNM classification improved the ability to stratify patients for risk of recurrence. The results of this study suggest that addition of ZEB2 expression status to the TNM staging system improves the ability to stratify patients at high risk of recurrence.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisZinc Finger E-box Binding Homeobox 2Biomarkers, TumorZEB2 protein, humanZinc Finger E-box Binding Homeobox 2

Identifiers

PMID30646224
PMCPMC6324431
OpenAlexW2897535406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.