Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30646223›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2018

Effectiveness of Online vs In-Person Care for Adults With Psoriasis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

April W Armstrong, Cindy J Chambers, Emanual Maverakis, Michelle Y Cheng, Cory A Dunnick, Mary-Margaret Chren, Joel M Gelfand, David J Wong, Brittany M Gibbons, Caitlin M Gibbons and 19 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02358135 nacompletednot on this map

Collaborative Connected Health (CCH): A Pragmatic Trial Evaluating Effectiveness of CCH in Psoriasis Management Compared to In-person Visits.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern CaliforniaRan2015 to 2017Enrolled300ConditionsPsoriasisArmsCollaborative Connected health, (CCH), Control
NCT05425797 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Building on Existing Tools To Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care Virtually: the Virtual BETTER Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMemorial University of NewfoundlandRan2023 to 2024Enrolled92ConditionsDelivery Modality of BETTER InterventionArmsIn-Person Prevention Practitioner Visit, Video-Call Prevention Practitioner Visit, Phone Prevention Practitioner Visit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Adult patient access to electronic health records.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Understanding patient priorities in teledermatology for psoriasis: A discrete choice experiment.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Digital health applications, telemedicine and large language models in dermatology: results of a Germany-wide survey.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Qualitative study of patient-reported outcome data collection among clinicians in dermatology at a single academic center.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  12. Engagement and retention with remote monitoring in psoriasis: Findings from the mySkin study.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Effect of Telemedicine on Preventive Medicine- A Case from Israel.Israel journal of health policy research · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review of Teledermatology: Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

April W ArmstrongDepartment of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Cindy J ChambersDepartment of Dermatology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
Emanual MaverakisDepartment of Dermatology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
Michelle Y ChengDepartment of Dermatology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
Cory A DunnickDepartment of Dermatology, University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Mary-Margaret ChrenDepartment of Dermatology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Joel M GelfandDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
David J WongDepartment of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, California.
Brittany M GibbonsDepartment of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Caitlin M GibbonsDepartment of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Josefina TorresDepartment of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Andrea C SteelDepartment of Dermatology, University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Elizabeth A WangDepartment of Dermatology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
Caitlin M ClarkUniversity of Hawaii-Manoa John A. Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu.
Sanminder SinghDepartment of Dermatology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
Heather A KornmehlDrexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Reason WilkenDepartment of Dermatology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
Aleksandra G FlorekDepartment of Dermatology, University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Adam R FordDepartment of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Chelsea MaDepartment of Dermatology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
Nazanin Ehsani-ChimehDepartment of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Sucharita BodduDepartment of Dermatology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento.
Mayumi FujitaDepartment of Dermatology, University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Paulina M YoungDepartment of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Cesar Rivas-SanchezDepartment of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Brenda I CornejoDepartment of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Laura C SernaClinical and Translational Science Institute, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Eric R CarlsonRocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Parker, Colorado.
Christianne J LaneDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
University of Southern California · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USDrexel University · USRocky Vista University · USSouthern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute · USStanford University · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute IHS-071502-IC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Innovative, online models of specialty-care delivery are critical to improving patient access and outcomes. Objective: To determine whether an online, collaborative connected-health model results in equivalent clinical improvements in psoriasis compared with in-person care. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Psoriasis Teledermatology Trial is a 12-month, pragmatic, randomized clinical equivalency trial to evaluate the effect of an online model for psoriasis compared with in-person care. Participant recruitment and study visits took place at multicenter ambulatory clinics from February 2, 2015, to August 18, 2017. Participants were adults with psoriasis in Northern California, Southern California, and Colorado. The eligibility criteria were an age of 18 years or older, having physician-diagnosed psoriasis, access to the internet and a digital camera or mobile phone with a camera, and having a primary care physician. Analyses were on an intention-to-treat basis. Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive online or in-person care (148 randomized to online care and 148 randomized to in-person care). The online model enabled patients and primary care physicians to access dermatologists online asynchronously. The dermatologists provided assessments, recommendations, education, and prescriptions online. The in-person group sought care in person. The frequency of online or in-person visits was determined by medical necessity. All participants were exposed to their respective interventions for 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: The prespecified primary outcome was the difference in improvement in the self-administered Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score between the online and in-person groups. Prespecified secondary outcomes included body surface area (BSA) affected by psoriasis and the patient global assessment score. Results: Of the 296 randomized participants, 147 were women, 149 were men, 187 were white, and the mean (SD) age was 49 (14) years. The adjusted difference between the online and in-person groups in the mean change in the self-administered PASI score during the 12-month study period was -0.27 (95% CI, -0.85 to 0.31). The difference in the mean change in BSA affected by psoriasis between the 2 groups was -0.05% (95% CI, -1.58% to 1.48%). Between-group differences in the PASI score and BSA were within prespecified equivalence margins, which demonstrated equivalence between the 2 interventions. The difference in the mean change in the patient global assessment score between the 2 groups was -0.11 (95% CI, -0.32 to 0.10), which exceeded the equivalence margin, with the online group displaying greater improvement. Conclusions and Relevance: The online, collaborative connected-health model was as effective as in-person management in improving clinical outcomes among patients with psoriasis. Innovative telehealth delivery models that emphasize collaboration, quality, and efficiency can be transformative to improving patient-centered outcomes in chronic diseases. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02358135.

Indexed as

AdultAmbulatory CareFemaleHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePsoriasisSeverity of Illness IndexTelemedicineTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30646223
PMCPMC6324453
OpenAlexW2897063798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.