Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30646184›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2018

Assessment of Opioid Prescribing Practices Before and After Implementation of a Health System Intervention to Reduce Opioid Overprescribing.

Barry R Meisenberg, Jennifer Grover, Colson Campbell, Daniel Korpon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Comparative analysis of analgesic mechanisms in craniotomy pediatric patients: a scoping review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Barry R MeisenbergCenter for Health Care Improvement, Department of Medicine, Anne Arundel Health System, Annapolis, Maryland.
Jennifer GroverCenter for Health Care Improvement, Department of Medicine, Anne Arundel Health System, Annapolis, Maryland.
Colson CampbellJohns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Daniel KorponDepartment of Informatics, Anne Arundel Health System, Annapolis, Maryland.
Anne Arundel Medical Center · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Overprescribing of opioids has generated and sustains the opioid overdose epidemic. Health systems have a responsibility to lead the effort to reduce overprescribing. Objective: To measure the effects of multilevel interventions on opioid prescribing within a health system. Design, Setting, and Participants: Quality improvement study comparing a 6-month preintervention baseline with a 16-month postintervention period ending in April 2018. Inpatient and outpatient clinical activity within a regional health system including an acute care hospital, same-day surgery, and outpatient clinics. Opioid prescribing activity by hundreds of clinicians involving over a million clinical encounters was measured using a health system's electronic medical record. Interventions: Multiple parallel interventions in different domains, including prescriber education and accountability, enhanced oversight via measurement of individual prescribers, tools to right-size postoperative discharge prescriptions, reduction of default amounts on standard opioid prescription orders, and professionally written patient and public education about opioid risks and alternatives. Main Outcomes and Measures: Morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per encounter per month, MME per opioid prescription, and rate of opioid prescriptions (opioid prescriptions per encounter per month). Results: More than 44 000 clinical encounters per month were recorded. All baseline trends were not significantly different from 0. Total health system MME per encounter decreased 1.0 MME per encounter per month. At the end of the postintervention observation period, the monthly MME per encounter was 58% lower than the average of the 6-month baseline, the MME per opioid prescription per month was 34% less than the average of the baseline, and the opioid prescription rate was 38% lower than the average of the baseline. Conclusions and Relevance: Opioid overprescribing was reduced with multifocal interventions targeting patient and public demand, creating prescriber awareness and accountability, and creating tools for clinical leadership accountability. The interventions described are adoptable by most organized health systems. Reducing total opioid supply within communities should be given high priority by those with a mission to protect and improve public health.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidEpidemicsHumansInappropriate PrescribingMarylandMorphinePractice Patterns, Physicians'Quality ImprovementAnalgesics, OpioidMorphine

Identifiers

PMID30646184
PMCPMC6324493
OpenAlexW2893411070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.