ArticleJAMA network open2018
Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Applications in Clinical Settings.
Article in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- AI for IMPACTS Framework for Evaluating the Long-Term Real-World Impacts of AI-Powered Clinician Tools: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy: the Real-World Emerging Application.Current diabetes reports · 2019Pooled it
- Design Characteristics of Studies Reporting the Performance of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Diagnostic Analysis of Medical Images: Results from Recently Published Papers.Korean journal of radiology · 2019Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for early detection of diabetes mellitus complications via retinal imaging.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025Review
- Global Research Landscape of Artificial Intelligence in Urology: A Systematic Analysis of Emerging Trends, Clinical Impact, and Collaborative Networks (1971-2024).Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Article
- Article
- Constructing and implementing a performance evaluation indicator set for artificial intelligence decision support systems in pediatric outpatient clinics: an observational study.Scientific reports · 2024Observational
- Large-Scale assessment of ChatGPT's performance in benign and malignant bone tumors imaging report diagnosis and its potential for clinical applications.Journal of bone oncology · 2024Article
- Review
- The AI life cycle: a holistic approach to creating ethical AI for health decisions.Nature medicine · 2022Article
- Key concepts, common pitfalls, and best practices in artificial intelligence and machine learning: focus on radiomics.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2022Review
- Rethinking Algorithm Performance Metrics for Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Medicine.JAMA · 2022Article
- Article
- Generalizability challenges of mortality risk prediction models: A retrospective analysis on a multi-center database.PLOS digital health · 2022Article
- Utilization of Artificial Intelligence in Disease Prevention: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Implications for the Healthcare Workforce.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The upcoming role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for retinal and glaucomatous diseases.Journal of optometry · 2022Review
- Evaluation framework to guide implementation of AI systems into healthcare settings.BMJ health & care informatics · 2021Review
- Article
- Artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening: primary care provider preferences.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30646173What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.