Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30646165›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2018

Association of Intraventricular Hemorrhage and Death With Tocolytic Exposure in Preterm Infants.

Gaëlle Pinto Cardoso, Estelle Houivet, Laetitia Marchand-Martin, Gilles Kayem, Loïc Sentilhes, Pierre-Yves Ancel, Elsa Lorthe, Stéphane Marret, EPIPAGE-2 Working Group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gaëlle Pinto CardosoDepartment of Neonatal Pediatrics and Intensive Care, Neuropediatrics and Rehabilitation Center, Reference Centre for Learning Disabilities of the Child, Rehabilitation Centre, Rouen University Hospital-Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France.
Estelle HouivetDepartment of Biostatistics, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Laetitia Marchand-MartinINSERM U1153, Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Center, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Maternité Port-Royal, Paris Descartes University France, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire Risk in Pregnancy, Paris, France.
Gilles KayemINSERM U1153, Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Center, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Maternité Port-Royal, Paris Descartes University France, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire Risk in Pregnancy, Paris, France.
Loïc SentilhesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Pierre-Yves AncelINSERM U1153, Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Center, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Maternité Port-Royal, Paris Descartes University France, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire Risk in Pregnancy, Paris, France.
Elsa LortheINSERM U1153, Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Center, Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Team, Maternité Port-Royal, Paris Descartes University France, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire Risk in Pregnancy, Paris, France.
Stéphane MarretDepartment of Neonatal Pediatrics and Intensive Care, Neuropediatrics and Rehabilitation Center, Reference Centre for Learning Disabilities of the Child, Rehabilitation Centre, Rouen University Hospital-Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France.
EPIPAGE-2 Working Group
Inserm · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversité de Rouen Normandie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: No trials to date have demonstrated the benefits of tocolysis on death and/or neonatal morbidity in preterm infants; tocolytics may affect the fetal blood-brain barrier. Objectives: To assess the risks associated with tocolysis in women delivering prematurely as measured by death and/or intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) in preterm infants and to compare the association of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) nifedipine and nicardipine hydrochloride vs atosiban used for tocolysis with death and/or IVH. Design, Settings, and Participants: The French 2011 EPIPAGE-2 (Enquête Épidémiologique sur les Petits Âges Gestationnels) cohort was limited to mothers admitted for preterm labor without fever, who delivered from 24 to 31 weeks of gestation from April 1 through December 31, 2011. Groups of preterm infants with vs without tocolytic exposure and groups with atosiban vs CCB exposure were compared. Data analysis was performed from June 7, 2014, through September 3, 2017. Exposures: Tocolytics. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of death and/or IVH in preterm infants. Secondary outcomes included death, IVH, and a composite of death and/or grades III to IV IVH. Results: A total of 1127 mothers (mean [SD] age, 25.5 [6.0] years) experienced preterm labor and gave birth to 1343 preterm infants with a male to female ratio of 1.23 and mean (SD) gestational age of 27 (2.5) weeks. Of these, 789 mothers (70.0%) received tocolytics; 314 (39.8%) received only atosiban, and 118 (15.0%) received only a CCB. In the first analysis, the primary outcome (death and/or IVH) was not significantly different in preterm infants with vs without tocolytic exposure (183 of 363 [50.4%] vs 207 of 363 [57.0%]; relative risk [RR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.77-1.01; P = .07). The secondary outcome (death and/or grades III-IV IVH) was significantly lower in preterm infants with vs without tocolytic exposure (92 of 363 [25.3%] vs 118 of 363 [32.5%]; RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.98; P = .03). Other outcomes did not differ significantly. In the secondary analysis, death and/or IVH was not significantly different in preterm infants with atosiban vs CCB exposure (96 of 214 [44.9%] vs 62 of 121 [51.2%]; RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.70-1.10; P = .26), nor was IVH (77 of 197 [39.1%] vs 48 of 106 [45.3%]; RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.66-1.13; P = .29). Conclusions and Relevance: In this population-based study, findings suggest that tocolytics were associated with a reduction of death and severe IVH. Other studies are necessary to compare perinatal outcomes after use of atosiban vs CCBs.

Indexed as

DeathAdultCerebral Intraventricular HemorrhageFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMalePregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsTocolytic AgentsVasotocinatosibanTocolytic AgentsVasotocin

Identifiers

PMID30646165
PMCPMC6324618
OpenAlexW2895895963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.