ArticleJAMA network open2018
Exome Sequencing-Based Screening for BRCA1/2 Expected Pathogenic Variants Among Adult Biobank Participants.
Article in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06914726 (Randomized Trial to Improve Care of Patients With Hereditary Cancer Syndromes), which is not on this map. Cited by 129 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Trial to Improve Care of Patients With Hereditary Cancer Syndromes
Who cites it
129 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 210 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Cost Effectiveness of Genomic Medicine in Cancer Control: A Systematic Literature Review.Applied health economics and health policy · 2025Pooled it
- Cancer Predisposition Genes in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs): a Review Paper from the Italian AYA Working Group.Current oncology reports · 2022Pooled it
- Uterine serous carcinoma and germline genetic testing: patterns of referral, completion and pathogenic variant detection.Journal of medical genetics · 2026Article
- Opportunistic Screening of High-Risk Breast Cancer Variants in Hospital Biobank Setting.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026Article
- What it Takes to Implement Population-Based Genomic Screening: A Multi-Site Qualitative Study of Implementation Determinants Across Health Systems.Research square · 2026Article
- Measuring disease likelihood in genomic ascertainment.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Precision Medicine in Rural Settings: Patient Perspectives on Clinician-Ordered Genetic Testing.Research square · 2026Article
- Reproductive Decision-Making Among BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variants Carriers and Physicians: Attitudes Toward Preimplantation and Prenatal Genetic Testing.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Article
- Discovering Hereditary Risk Through Surveillance: A Prospective Genetic Analysis of Individuals With Familial Pancreatic Cancer.United European gastroenterology journal · 2026Article
- Feasibility and outcomes of the DNA Screen nationwide adult genomic screening pilot.Nature health · 2026Article
- Health actions after direct-to-consumer genetic testing for medically actionable conditions.Genetics in medicine open · 2026Article
- Yield of actionable variants from high-risk cancer gene panel testing in guideline-eligible and ineligible individuals.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Unmet needs after prevention: a model for managing premature surgical menopause post-risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2025Article
- Monte Carlo Tree Search for optimal cancer intervention strategies among BRCA mutation carriers.Computers in biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Implementation Mapping to Identify Best Practices for Implementing Population-Wide Genomic Screening Programs: Protocol for the FOCUS (Facilitating the Implementation of Population-Wide Genomic Screening) Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Utility of Germline, Somatic and ctDNA Testing in Adults With Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- Genomic Screening at a Single Health System.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Evolving knowledge of red flag clinical features associated with TTR p.(Val142Ile) in a diverse electronic health-record-linked biobank.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025Article
- Primary Care Providers' Experiences With an Active Elective Genetic Testing Program.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2025Article
- Elective genomic screening: results of the implementation of a whole genome sequencing program at a medical check-up unit in Spain.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
44 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Detection of disease-associated variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) genes allows for cancer prevention and early diagnosis in high-risk individuals. Objectives: To identify pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) BRCA1/2 variants in an unselected research cohort, and to characterize the features associated with P/LP variants. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a cross-sectional study of adult volunteers (n = 50 726) who underwent exome sequencing at a single health care system (Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania) from January 1, 2014, to March 1, 2016. Participants are part of the DiscovEHR cohort and were identified through the Geisinger MyCode Community Health Initiative. They consented to a research protocol that included sequencing and return of actionable test results. Clinical data from electronic health records and clinical visits were correlated with variants. Comparisons were made between those with (cases) and those without (controls) P/LP variants in BRCA1/2. Main Outcomes: Prevalence of P/LP BRCA1/2 variants in cohort, proportion of variant carriers not previously ascertained through clinical testing, and personal and family history of relevant cancers among BRCA1/2 variant carriers and noncarriers. Results: Of the 50 726 health system patients who underwent exome sequencing, 50 459 (99.5%) had no expected pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants and 267 (0.5%) were BRCA1/2 carriers. Of the 267 cases (148 [55.4%] were women and 119 [44.6%] were men with a mean [range] age of 58.9 [23-90] years), 183 (68.5%) received clinically confirmed results in their electronic health record. Among the 267 participants with P/LP BRCA1/2 variants, 219 (82.0%) had no prior clinical testing, 95 (35.6%) had BRCA1 variants, and 172 (64.4%) had BRCA2 variants. Syndromic cancer diagnoses were present in 11 (47.8%) of the 23 deceased BRCA1/2 carriers and in 56 (20.9%) of all 267 BRCA1/2 carriers. Among women, 31 (20.9%) of 148 variant carriers had a personal history of breast cancer, compared with 1554 (5.2%) of 29 880 noncarriers (odds ratio [OR], 5.95; 95% CI, 3.88-9.13; P < .001). Ovarian cancer history was present in 15 (10.1%) of 148 variant carriers and in 195 (0.6%) of 29 880 variant noncarriers (OR, 18.30; 95% CI, 10.48-31.4; P < .001). Among 89 BRCA1/2 carriers without prior testing but with comprehensive personal and family history data, 44 (49.4%) did not meet published guidelines for clinical testing. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that compared with previous clinical care, exome sequencing-based screening identified 5 times as many individuals with P/LP BRCA1/2 variants. These findings suggest that genomic screening may identify BRCA1/2-associated cancer risk that might otherwise remain undetected within health care systems and may provide opportunities to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.