Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30646158›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2018

Outcomes of Delaying Parenteral Nutrition for 1 Week vs Initiation Within 24 Hours Among Undernourished Children in Pediatric Intensive Care: A Subanalysis of the PEPaNIC Randomized Clinical Trial.

Esther van Puffelen, Jessie M Hulst, Ilse Vanhorebeek, Karolijn Dulfer, Greet Van den Berghe, Sascha C A T Verbruggen, Koen F M Joosten

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01536275 (Impact of Early Parenteral Nutrition Completing Enteral Nutrition in Paediatric Critically Ill Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01536275 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Impact of Early Parenteral Nutrition Completing Enteral Nutrition in Paediatric Critically Ill Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorKU LeuvenRan2012 to 2026Enrolled1,440ConditionsCritical Illness, ChildrenArmsLate parenteral nutrition
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Esther van PuffelenDepartment of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery, Intensive Care Unit, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jessie M HulstDivision of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Ilse VanhorebeekClinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University Hospitals Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Karolijn DulferDepartment of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery, Intensive Care Unit, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Greet Van den BergheClinical Division and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University Hospitals Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sascha C A T VerbruggenDepartment of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery, Intensive Care Unit, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Koen F M JoostenDepartment of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery, Intensive Care Unit, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Erasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLKU Leuven · BEHospital for Sick Children · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Undernourishment has been associated with poor outcomes of critical illness in children. The effects of withholding parenteral nutrition (PN) for 1 week in undernourished critically ill children are unknown. Objective: To assess the outcome effects of withholding PN for 1 week in undernourished critically ill children. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a subanalysis of the randomized clinical trial Pediatric Early vs Late Parenteral Nutrition in Intensive Care Unit (PEPaNIC; N = 1440), which focused on the subgroup of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients identified as undernourished on admission. Children included in the PEPaNIC trial were enrolled between June 18, 2012, and July 27, 2015. Undernourishment was defined as weight-for-age z score less than -2 in children younger than 1 year, and body mass index-for-age z score less than -2 in children 1 year or older. Data analysis was conducted from August 3, 2017, to July 6, 2018. Interventions: Patients were randomized to initiation of supplemental PN within 24 hours (early PN) or after 1 week (late PN) when enteral nutrition was insufficient. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end points were risk of new infections acquired in the PICU and time to live PICU discharge, assessed via multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard analyses, adjusted for risk factors. Results: A total of 289 of 1440 children (20.1%), term newborn to age 17 years, were identified as undernourished, of whom 150 of 717 patients (20.9%) were in the late PN group and 139 of 723 patients (19.2%) were in the early PN group. On admission, characteristics were similar among the treatment groups. Mean (SD) weight z scores were -3.33 (1.18) in the late PN group and -3.21 (1.09) in the early PN group. Compared with well-nourished PICU patients, undernourishment on admission was associated with lower likelihood of an earlier live PICU discharge (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.99; P = .03). Among undernourished PICU patients, late PN reduced the risk of new infections by 11.0% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.19-0.78; P = .01), and shortened the duration of PICU stay by a median of 2 days (earlier live PICU discharge: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.06-1.75; P = .01). The safety outcomes mortality, incidence of hypoglycemia during the first week, and incidence of weight deterioration during PICU stay were similar between the treatment groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In undernourished critically ill children, withholding PN for 1 week was clinically superior to early PN. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01536275.

Indexed as

Time FactorsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantIntensive Care Units, PediatricLogistic ModelsMaleMalnutritionParenteral NutritionPediatricsProportional Hazards Models

Identifiers

PMID30646158
PMCPMC6324499
OpenAlexW2891018315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.