Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30646151›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2018

Variations in Influenza Vaccination by Clinic Appointment Time and an Active Choice Intervention in the Electronic Health Record to Increase Influenza Vaccination.

Rebecca H Kim, Susan C Day, Dylan S Small, Christopher K Snider, Charles A L Rareshide, Mitesh S Patel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Assessing Decision Fatigue in General Practitioners' Prescribing Decisions Using the Australian BEACH Data Set.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Article
  10. A Framework for Integrating Telehealth Equitably across the cancer care continuum.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Antimicrobials in Sepsis: Time to Pay Attention toAnnals of the American Thoracic Society · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The challenge of cognitive science for medical diagnosis.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca H KimPenn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Susan C DayPenn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Dylan S SmallPenn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Christopher K SniderPenn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Charles A L RareshidePenn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Mitesh S PatelPenn Medicine Nudge Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pennsylvania Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Influenza vaccination rates in the United States are suboptimal near 40%, but little is known about variations in care based on clinic appointment time. Objectives: To compare differences in influenza vaccination rates by clinic appointment time and to evaluate the association of an active choice intervention in the electronic health record with changes in vaccination rates. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective, quality improvement study of 11 primary care practices at the University of Pennsylvania Health System from September 1, 2014, to March 31, 2017. Participants included adults eligible for influenza vaccination. Data analysis was conducted from October 20, 2017, to March 9, 2018. Interventions: During the 2016 to 2017 influenza season, 3 primary care practices at the University of Pennsylvania Health System implemented an active choice intervention in the electronic health record that prompted medical assistants to ask patients about influenza vaccination during check-in and template vaccination orders for clinicians to review during the visit. Main Outcomes and Measures: Influenza vaccination rates. Results: The sample comprised 96 291 patients with a mean (SD) age of 56.2 (17.0) years; 41 865 (43.5%) were men, 61 813 (64.2%) were white, and 23 802 (24.7%) were black. Among all practices across all 3 years, vaccination rates were approximately 44% from 8 am to 10 am, declined to 41.2% by 11 am and 38.3% at noon, increased to 40.2% at 1 pm, and then declined to 34.3% at 3 pm and 32.0% at 4 pm (P < .001 for adjusted linear trend). For the 3 years, vaccination rates were 46.9%, 47.2%, and 45.6% at control practices and 49.7%, 52.2%, and 59.3% at intervention practices, respectively. In adjusted analyses, compared with control practices over time, the active choice intervention was associated with a significant 9.5-percentage point increase in vaccination rates (95% CI, 4.1-14.3; P < .001). Vaccination rates increased similarly across times of the day. Conclusions and Relevance: Influenza vaccination rates significantly declined as the clinic day progressed. The active choice intervention was associated with a significant increase in influenza vaccination rates that were similar in magnitude throughout the day.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesAdultAgedElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansImmunization ProgramsInfluenza, HumanMaleMiddle AgedPennsylvaniaPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsVaccination

Identifiers

PMID30646151
PMCPMC6324515
OpenAlexW2891848145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.