Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30646121›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2018

Association of Long-term Outcomes and Survival With Multidisciplinary Salvage Treatment for Local and Regional Recurrence After Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer.

Eric D Brooks, Bing Sun, Lei Feng, Vivek Verma, Lina Zhao, Daniel R Gomez, Zhongxing Liao, Melenda Jeter, Michael O'Reilly, James W Welsh and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Eric D BrooksDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Bing SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Lei FengDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Vivek VermaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.
Lina ZhaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Daniel R GomezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Zhongxing LiaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Melenda JeterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Michael O'ReillyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
James W WelshDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Quynh-Nhu NguyenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Jeremy J ErasmusDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
George EapenDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Kamran AhrarDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Mara B AntonoffDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Stephen M HahnDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
John V HeymachDepartment of Thoracic Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
David C RiceDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Joe Y ChangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is first-line treatment for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who cannot undergo surgery. However, up to 1 in 6 such patients will develop isolated local recurrence (iLR) or isolated regional recurrence (iRR). Little is known about outcomes when disease recurs after SABR, or about optimal management strategies for such recurrences. Objective: To characterize long-term outcomes for patients with iLR or iRR after SABR for early-stage NSCLC with the aim of informing treatment decision making for these patients with potentially curable disease. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, a retrospective review was conducted of 912 patients prospectively enrolled in an institutional database at a tertiary cancer center from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2014. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival, progression-free survival, recurrence patterns, demographics, salvage techniques, patterns of salvage failure, and toxic effects. Results: Of the 912 patients in the study (456 women and 456 men; median age, 72 years [range, 46-91 years]), 756 (82.9%) had T1 tumors at initial diagnosis; 502 tumors (55.0%) were adenocarcinomas and 309 tumors (33.9%) were squamous cell carcinomas. Of 912 patients with early-stage I to II NSCLC who received definitive SABR (50 Gy in 4 fractions or 70 Gy in 10 fractions), 102 developed isolated recurrence (49 with iLR and 53 with iRR), and 658 had no recurrence. Median times to recurrence after SABR were 14.5 months (range, 1.5-60.8 months) for iLR and 9.0 months (range, 1.9-70.7 months) for iRR; 39 of 49 patients (79.6%) with iLR and 48 of 53 patients (90.6%) with iRR underwent salvage with reirradiation, surgery, thermal ablation, or chemotherapy. Median follow-up times for patients with iLR or iRR were 57.2 months (interquartile range, 37.7-87.6 months) from initial SABR and 38.5 months (interquartile range, 19.9-69.3 months) from recurrence. Rates of overall survival at 5 years from initial SABR were no different between patients with iLR and salvage treatment (57.9%) and patients with no recurrence (54.9%; hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.56-1.43; P = .65) but were lower for patients with iRR and salvage treatment (31.1%; hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.00-2.34; P = .049). Patients receiving salvage treatment had longer overall survival than patients who did not (median, 37 vs 7 months after recurrence; hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.09-0.66; P = .006). Twenty-four of 87 patients (27.6%) who received salvage treatment for iLR or iRR subsequently developed distant metastases. No patient experienced grade 5 toxic effects after salvage treatment. Conclusions and Relevance: Life expectancy after salvage treatment for iLR was similar to that for patients without recurrence, but survival after salvage treatment for iRR was similar to that of patients with stage III NSCLC. Patients who received salvage treatment had significantly improved survival. Because salvage treatment for iLR or iRR was based on a consistent multidisciplinary approach, this may help in clinical decision making.

Indexed as

RadiosurgeryAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasms, Second PrimaryNeoplasm StagingPatient Care TeamRetrospective StudiesSalvage Therapy

Identifiers

PMID30646121
PMCPMC6324276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.