Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30646111›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2018

Association Between Guideline-Discordant Prostate Cancer Imaging Rates and Health Care Service Among Veterans and Medicare Recipients.

Danil V Makarov, Shannon Ciprut, Dawn Walter, Matthew Kelly, Heather T Gold, Xiao-Hua Zhou, Scott E Sherman, Ronald Scott Braithwaite, Cary Gross, Steven Zeliadt

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of PSMA PET Staging on Initial Treatment in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Danil V MakarovDepartment of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York.
Shannon CiprutDepartment of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York.
Dawn WalterDepartment of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York.
Matthew KellyDepartment of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York.
Heather T GoldDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York.
Xiao-Hua ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle.
Scott E ShermanDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York.
Ronald Scott BraithwaiteDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York.
Cary GrossCancer Outcomes Policy and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Steven ZeliadtHealth Services Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
New York University · USVA NY Harbor Healthcare System · USHealth Services Research & Development · USUniversity of Washington · USYale University · US

Funding

Vaccine FacilityP30CA016087 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ANIRBAN MAITRA · 1985 to 2026
$83.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Prostate cancer imaging rates appear to vary by health care setting. With the recent extension of the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act, the government has provided funds for veterans to seek care outside the Veterans Health Administration (VA). It is important to understand the difference in imaging rates and subsequent differences in patterns of care in the VA vs a traditional fee-for-service setting such as Medicare. Objective: To assess the association between prostate cancer imaging rates and a VA vs fee-for-service health care setting. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included data for men who received a diagnosis of prostate cancer from January 1, 2004, through March 31, 2008, that were collected from the VA Central Cancer Registry, linked to administrate claims and Medicare utilization records, and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database. Three distinct nationally representative cohorts were constructed (use of VA only, use of Medicare only, and dual use of VA and Medicare). Men older than 85 years at diagnosis and men without high-risk features but missing any tumor risk characteristic (prostate-specific antigen, Gleason grade, or clinical stage) were excluded. Analysis of the data was completed from March 2016 to February 2018. Exposures: Patient utilization of different health care delivery systems. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rates of prostate cancer imaging were analyzed by health care setting (Medicare only, VA and Medicare, and VA only) among patients with low-risk prostate cancer and patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Results: Of 98 867 men with prostate cancer (77.4% white; mean [SD] age, 70.26 [7.48] years) in the study cohort, 57.3% were in the Medicare-only group, 14.5% in the VA and Medicare group, and 28.1% in the VA-only group. Among men with low-risk prostate cancer, the Medicare-only group had the highest rate of guideline-discordant imaging (52.5%), followed by the VA and Medicare group (50.9%) and the VA-only group (45.9%) (P < .001). Imaging rates for men with high-risk prostate cancer were not significantly different among the 3 groups. Multivariable analysis showed that individuals in the VA and Medicare group (risk ratio [RR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76-0.98) and VA-only group (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67-0.92) were less likely to receive guideline-discordant imaging than those in the Medicare-only group. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this study suggest that patients with prostate cancer who use Medicare rather than the VA for health care could experience more utilization of health care services without an improvement in the quality of care.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareFee-for-Service PlansMedicareUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeterans HealthAgedCohort StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPractice Guidelines as TopicProcedures and Techniques UtilizationProstatic NeoplasmsRadionuclide Imaging

Identifiers

PMID30646111
PMCPMC6324262
OpenAlexW2888438255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.