Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30646103›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2018

Association of Radiotherapy With Survival in Women Treated for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ With Lumpectomy or Mastectomy.

Vasily Giannakeas, Victoria Sopik, Steven A Narod

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Could circulating tumor cells explain why breast conservation improves survival despite higher locoregional recurrence?Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Countercurrents: DCIS or Cancer? Why All the Confusion?Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cost-Effectiveness of Adjuvant Treatment for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Psychological morbidity in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ compared with women with early breast cancer receiving radiotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vasily GiannakeasWomen's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Victoria SopikWomen's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Steven A NarodWomen's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAPublic Health Ontario · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are treated with radiotherapy to reduce their risk of local invasive recurrence after breast-conserving surgery. However, the association of radiotherapy with breast cancer survival in patients with DCIS has not yet been clearly established. Objective: To determine the extent to which radiotherapy is associated with reduced risk of breast cancer mortality in a large cohort of patients treated for DCIS, using a propensity score-based matching approach. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study of women who had first primary DCIS diagnosed between 1998 and 2014 used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 registries database. Information on age and year of diagnosis, ethnicity, income, tumor size, tumor grade, estrogen receptor status, all treatments (surgery and radiation), and outcomes (invasive local recurrence and death from breast cancer) was abstracted for 140 366 women diagnosed with first primary DCIS. Three separate comparisons were performed using 1:1 matching: lumpectomy with radiation vs lumpectomy alone; lumpectomy alone vs mastectomy; and lumpectomy with radiation vs mastectomy. Exposures: Use of radiotherapy and/or extent of surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: Crude and adjusted 15-year breast cancer-specific mortality. Results: Of the 140 366 patients with DCIS in the cohort (109 712 [78.2%] white; mean [SD] age, 58.8 [12.3] years), 35 070 (25.0%) were treated with lumpectomy alone, 65 301 (46.5%) were treated with lumpectomy and radiotherapy, and 39 995 (28.5%) were treated with mastectomy. The actuarial 15-year breast cancer mortality rate was 2.33% for patients treated with lumpectomy alone, 1.74% for patients treated with lumpectomy and radiation, and 2.26% for patients treated with mastectomy. The adjusted hazard ratios for death were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.67-0.88) for lumpectomy and radiotherapy vs lumpectomy alone (29 465 propensity-matched pairs), 0.91 (95% CI, 0.78-1.05) for mastectomy alone vs lumpectomy alone (20 832 propensity-matched pairs), and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.65-0.87) for lumpectomy and radiotherapy vs mastectomy (29 865 propensity-matched pairs). Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with DCIS, treatment with lumpectomy and radiotherapy was associated with a significant reduction in breast cancer mortality compared with either lumpectomy alone or mastectomy alone. This suggests that the survival benefit of radiation is likely not due to local control, but rather to systemic effects.

Indexed as

MastectomyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCohort StudiesCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreRadiotherapy, AdjuvantSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID30646103
PMCPMC6324271
OpenAlexW2886013728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.