ArticleJAMA network open2018
Risk Factors Associated With Major Cardiovascular Events 1 Year After Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Article in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prior Myocardial Infarction and Treatment Effect of Ticagrelor Versus Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes - A Post-hoc Analysis of the ISAR-REACT 5 Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Trial
- Development and Validation of NICVD-NQ Score for Predicting Short-Term Outcomes After Primary PCI.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-enhanced three-dimensional echocardiography reveals left atrial-ventricular coupling index as a novel prognostic marker in coronary artery disease.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Frequency of Microvascular Pathology and Hippocampal Atrophy on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Community Study of Alzheimer's Disease with Blood-Based Biomarkers.Annals of neurology · 2025Article
- Clinical diagnostic and prognostic value of homocysteine combined with hemoglobin [f (Hcy-Hb)] in cardio-renal syndrome caused by primary acute myocardial infarction.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Observational
- Article
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model for acute kidney injury in coronary artery disease.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Observational
- Plasma infrared fingerprinting with machine learning enables single-measurement multi-phenotype health screening.Cell reports. Medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Plasma metabolic fingerprints for large-scale screening and personalized risk stratification of metabolic syndrome.Cell reports. Medicine · 2023Article
- Role of the Gut Microbiome in the Development of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Long-term outcomes in distinct phenogroups of patients with primary mitral regurgitation undergoing valve surgery.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2023Article
- Impact of myocardial deformation on risk prediction in patients following acute myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Genomic risk prediction of cardiovascular diseases among type 2 diabetes patients in the UK Biobank.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Epicardial Adipose Tissue as an Independent Cardiometabolic Risk Factor for Coronary Artery Disease.Cureus · 2022Review
- Clinical features and burden of osteoporotic fractures among the elderly in the USA from 2016 to 2018.Archives of osteoporosis · 2022Article
- Predictors of 1-Year Major Cardiovascular Events after ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in a Specialized Cardiovascular Center in Western Iran.The journal of Tehran Heart Center · 2022Article
- Lactobacillus levels and prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Patients who survive acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have a high risk of subsequent major cardiovascular events. Efforts to identify risk factors for recurrence have primarily focused on the period immediately following AMI admission. Objectives: To identify risk factors and develop and evaluate a risk model that predicts 1-year cardiovascular events after AMI. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prospective cohort study. Patients with AMI (n = 4227), aged 18 years or older, discharged alive from 53 acute-care hospitals across China from January 1, 2013, to July 17, 2014. Patients were randomly divided into samples: training (50% [2113 patients]), test (25% [1057 patients]), and validation (25% [1057 patients]). Risk factors were identified by a Cox model with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation and further evaluated by latent class analysis. Analyses were conducted from May 1, 2017, to January 21, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Major cardiovascular events, including recurrent AMI, stroke, heart failure, and death, within 1 year after discharge for the index AMI hospitalization. Results: The mean (SD) age of the cohort was 60.8 (11.8) years and 994 of 4227 patients (23.5%) were female. Common comorbidities included hypertension (2358 patients [55.8%]), coronary heart disease (1798 patients [42.5%]), and dyslipidemia (1290 patients [30.5%]). One-year event rates were 8.1% (95% CI, 6.91%-9.24%), 9.0% (95% CI, 7.22%-10.70%), and 6.4% (95% CI, 4.89%-7.85%) for the training, test, and validation samples, respectively. Nineteen risk factors comprising 15 unique variables (age, education, prior AMI, prior ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, hypertension, angina, prearrival medical assistance, >4 hours from onset of symptoms to admission, ejection fraction, renal dysfunction, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, white blood cell count, blood glucose, and in-hospital complications) were identified. In the training, test, and validation samples, respectively, the risk model had C statistics of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.75-0.83), 0.73 (95% CI, 0.68-0.78), and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.70-0.83) and a predictive range of 1.2% to 33.9%, 1.2% to 37.9%, and 1.3% to 34.3%. The C statistic was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.65-0.74) for the latent class model in the training data. The risk model stratified 11.3%, 81.0%, and 7.7% of patients to high-, average-, and low-risk groups, with respective probabilities of 0.32, 0.06, and 0.01 for 1-year events. Conclusions and Relevance: Nineteen risk factors were identified, and a model was developed and evaluated to predict risk of 1-year cardiovascular events after AMI. This may aid clinicians in identifying high-risk patients who would benefit most from intensive follow-up and aggressive risk factor reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.