ArticleJAMA network open2018
Age of Data at the Time of Publication of Contemporary Clinical Trials.
Article in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Unusual Findings in Trials Evaluating Adjuncts to Scaling and Root Planing: Reporting Quality (Part 2).JDR clinical and translational research · 2022Pooled it
- Shifts in Clinical Practice-Changing Acute Ischemic Stroke Research Over the Past Decade.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Timing of health technology assessment in the United States: An evaluation of ICER reviews over 8 years.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Article
- Preferences for rapid implementation science: a real-time discrete choice experiment.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Bacterial communities in Thai ticks: revealing geographical and methodological gaps in surveillance-a 25-year scoping review.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Review
- Publishing Relevant Health Research.Acta medica Philippina · 2026Article
- Teaching methods, facilities, and institutions in student ultrasound education (SUSE): e-learning, simulation, and ultrasound skills labs.Journal of ultrasonography · 2025Review
- Physician-Patient Communication about Novel Drugs and High-Risk Medical Devices.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025Article
- Lessons Learned from National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Covid-19 Clinical Trials.NEJM evidence · 2024Article
- REPRESENTATION AND EXTRAPOLATION: EVIDENCE FROM CLINICAL TRIALSThe quarterly journal of economics · 2024Article
- Time to Publication and Time-Lag Publication Bias for Randomized Trials on Connective Tissue Diseases.ACR open rheumatology · 2023Article
- Publication bias in trials registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: Is it a problem? A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Playing remotely in times of crisis: A program to overcome social isolation.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2022Article
- The Carbohydrate Threshold in Pregnancy and Gestational Diabetes: How Low Can We Go?Nutrients · 2021Review
- Inflection Point: Ideas for Accelerating Breakthroughs and Improving Cardiovascular Health.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2020Article
- Disseminating trial results: We can have both faster and better.Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020Article
- Guiding Principles for the Conduct of Observational Critical Care Research for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemics and Beyond: The Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study Registry.Critical care medicine · 2020Article
- Age of Data in Contemporary Research Articles Published in Representative General Radiology Journals.Korean journal of radiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: As medical knowledge and clinical practice rapidly evolve over time, there is an imperative to publish results of clinical trials in a timely way and reduce unnecessary delays. Objectives: To characterize the age of clinical trial data at the time of publication in journals with a high impact factor and highlight the time from final data collection to publication. Design and Setting: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted of all randomized clinical trials published from January 1 through December 31, 2015, in the Annals of Internal Medicine, BMJ, JAMA, JAMA Internal Medicine, Lancet, and New England Journal of Medicine. Multivariable linear regression analyses were conducted to assess whether data age (adjusted for follow-up duration) and publication time were associated with trial characteristics. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome measures were the midpoint of data collection until publication (data age), the time from first participant enrollment to last participant enrollment (enrollment time), and the time from final data collection to publication (publication time). Results: There were 341 clinical trials published in 2015 by the 6 journals. For assessment of the primary end point, 37 trials (10.9%) had a follow-up period of less than 1 month, 172 trials (50.4%) had a follow-up period of 1 month to 1 year, and 132 trials (38.7%) had a follow-up period of more than 1 year. For all trials, the median data age at publication was 33.9 months (interquartile range, 23.5-46.3 months). Among trials with a follow-up period of 1 month or less, the median data age was 30.6 months (interquartile range, 18.6-39.0 months). A total of 68 trials (19.9%) required more than 4 years to complete enrollment. The median time from the completion of data collection to publication was 14.8 months (interquartile range, 7.4-22.2 months); publication time was 2 or more years in 63 trials (18.5%). In multivariable regression analyses adjusted for follow-up time, inconclusive or unfavorable trial results were significantly associated with older data age (>235 days). Compared with trials funded only by private industry, trials funded by government were associated with a significantly longer time to publication (>180 days). Conclusions and Relevance: Clinical trials in journals with a high impact factor were published with a median data age of nearly 3 years. For a substantial proportion of studies, time for enrollment and time from completion of data collection to publication were quite long, indicating marked opportunities for improvement in clinical trials to reduce data age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.