ArticleJAMA network open2018
Development and Validation of an Electronic Health Record-Based Machine Learning Model to Estimate Delirium Risk in Newly Hospitalized Patients Without Known Cognitive Impairment.
Article in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
75 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prediction Models for In-Hospital Delirium Using Routinely Collected Electronic Health Record Data: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Pooled it
- Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2019Pooled it
- A large language model-driven multidisciplinary AI agent system predicts delirium in emergency critically ill patients.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Multi-output LSTM-based prediction of postoperative delirium: integrating baseline and perioperative data for enhanced risk stratification in older spine surgery patients.BioData mining · 2026Article
- Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorders: A Narrative Review of Pathophysiology, Prevention, and Management Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Leveraging free-text clinical records for heart disease classification through structured feature mapping.PloS one · 2026Article
- Trajectories of blood urea nitrogen and 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis-associated delirium: a retrospective cohort analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- The risk of delirium or dementia-related hospitalization among individuals living with dementia after long-term care entry: A population-based risk prediction model.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- Comorbidities associated with a clinically-recognized delirium diagnosis in the hospital using real world data.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Predicting ICU Delirium in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients Using Demographic, Clinical, and Laboratory Admission Data: A Machine Learning Approach.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Determining the ground truth for the prediction of delirium in adult patients in acute care: a scoping review.JAMIA open · 2025Review
- Development of a Disease Model for Predicting Postoperative Delirium Using Combined Blood Biomarkers.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Early Prediction of Delirium in Intensive Care Units Using Continuous Physiological Data: Retrospective Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Predicting Agitation-Sedation Levels in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Development of an Ensemble Model.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a Routine Electronic Health Record-Based Delirium Prediction Model for Surgical Patients Without Dementia: Retrospective Case-Control Study.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2025Article
- AI-delirium guard: Predictive modeling of postoperative delirium in elderly surgical patients.PloS one · 2025Article
- Predicting podoplanin expression and prognostic significance in high-grade glioma based on TCGA TCIA radiomics.PloS one · 2025Article
- Distinct immunological signatures define three sepsis recovery trajectories: a multi-cohort machine learning study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Automated derivation of diagnostic criteria for lung cancer using natural language processing on electronic health records: a pilot study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Echocardiographic Diagnosis of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy by Machine Learning.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024Article
15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Current methods for identifying hospitalized patients at increased risk of delirium require nurse-administered questionnaires with moderate accuracy. Objective: To develop and validate a machine learning model that predicts incident delirium risk based on electronic health data available on admission. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study evaluating 5 machine learning algorithms to predict delirium using 796 clinical variables identified by an expert panel as relevant to delirium prediction and consistently available in electronic health records within 24 hours of admission. The training set comprised 14 227 adult patients with non-intensive care unit hospital stays and no delirium on admission who were discharged between January 1, 2016, and August 31, 2017, from UCSF Health, a large academic health institution. The test set comprised 3996 patients with hospital stays who were discharged between August 1, 2017, and November 30, 2017. Exposures: Patient demographic characteristics, diagnoses, nursing records, laboratory results, and medications available in electronic health records during hospitalization. Main Outcomes and Measures: Delirium was defined as a positive Nursing Delirium Screening Scale or Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit score. Models were assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared against the 4-point scoring system AWOL (age >79 years, failure to spell world backward, disorientation to place, and higher nurse-rated illness severity), a validated delirium risk-assessment tool routinely administered in this cohort. Results: The training set included 14 227 patients (5113 [35.9%] aged >64 years; 7335 [51.6%] female; 687 [4.8%] with delirium), and the test set included 3996 patients (1491 [37.3%] aged >64 years; 1966 [49.2%] female; 191 [4.8%] with delirium). In total, the analysis included 18 223 hospital admissions (6604 [36.2%] aged >64 years; 9301 [51.0%] female; 878 [4.8%] with delirium). The AWOL system achieved a baseline AUC of 0.678. The gradient boosting machine model performed best, with an AUC of 0.855. Setting specificity at 90%, the model had a 59.7% (95% CI, 52.4%-66.7%) sensitivity, 23.1% (95% CI, 20.5%-25.9%) positive predictive value, 97.8% (95% CI, 97.4%-98.1%) negative predictive value, and a number needed to screen of 4.8. Penalized logistic regression and random forest models also performed well, with AUCs of 0.854 and 0.848, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Machine learning can be used to estimate hospital-acquired delirium risk using electronic health record data available within 24 hours of hospital admission. Such a model may allow more precise targeting of delirium prevention resources without increasing the burden on health care professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.