ArticleJAMA network open2018
Industry Payments to Physician Specialists Who Prescribe Repository Corticotropin.
Article in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Are Financial Payments From the Pharmaceutical Industry Associated With Physician Prescribing? : A Systematic Review.Annals of internal medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Trends in enforcement of National Comprehensive Cancer Network financial conflict of interest policy.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Article
- Trends in financial payments from industry to US cancer centers, 2014-2021.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Article
- The Association of Subspecialty and Sex with Industry Payments to Internal Medicine Physicians Who Recently Completed Training.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Observational
- Pharmaceutical industry payments and delivery of non-recommended and low value cancer drugs: population based cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023Article
- Article
- Characterizing industry payments to US teaching hospitals and affiliated physicians: a cross-sectional analysis of the Open Payments datasets from 2016 to 2022.Health affairs scholar · 2023Article
- Evaluation of non-research payments from pharmaceutical companies to urologists in Japan between 2016 and 2019.International urogynecology journal · 2023Article
- Cross-sectional analysis of pharmaceutical payments to Japanese board-certified gastroenterologists between 2016 and 2019.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Off-Label Use vs Off-Label Marketing of Drugs: Part 1: Off-Label Use-Patient Harms and Prescriber Responsibilities.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2023Article
- Trends in Industry Payments to Diabetologists and Endocrinologists in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Cureus · 2022Article
- Industry Payments to Physicians Are Kickbacks. How Should Stakeholders Respond?Journal of health politics, policy and law · 2022Article
- Article
- Physician Payments from Pharmaceutical Companies Related to Cancer Drugs.The oncologist · 2022Article
- Nature and Trends in Personal Payments Made to the Respiratory Physicians by Pharmaceutical Companies in Japan between 2016 and 2019.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2022Article
- Industry Payments Are Prevalent and Contagious in Subspecialty Medical Education.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Article
- Current understandings in treating children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2021Review
- Changes in PBM Business Practices in 2019: True Innovation or More of the Same?Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2020Article
- 2019 Update on Medical Overuse: A Review.JAMA internal medicine · 2019Article
- White paper: statement on conflicts of interest.Intensive care medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Despite great expense and little evidence supporting use over corticosteroids, prescriptions for repository corticotropin (H. P. Acthar Gel; Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals) have increased markedly. Aggressive sales tactics and payments from the manufacturer may influence prescribing behavior for this expensive medication. Objective: To characterize industry payments to physician specialists who prescribe corticotropin in the Medicare program. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study was a cross-sectional analysis of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 2015 Part D prescribing data linked to 2015 Open Payments data. Nephrologists, neurologists, and rheumatologists with more than 10 corticotropin prescriptions (frequent prescribers) in 2015 were included. Exposures: Frequency, category, and magnitude of corticotropin-related payments from Mallinckrodt recorded in the Open Payments database. Main Outcomes and Measures: Frequency, category, and magnitude of corticotropin-related payments from Mallinckrodt, as well as corticotropin prescriptions and expenditures for Medicare beneficiaries. Results: Of the 235 included physicians, 65 were nephrologists; 59, neurologists; and 111, rheumatologists. A majority of frequent corticotropin prescribers (207 [88%]) received corticotropin-related payments from Mallinckrodt. The median (range) total payment for 2015 was $189 ($11-$138 321), with the highest payments ranging from $56 549 to $138 321 across the specialties. More than 20% of frequent prescribers received more than $10 000 and the top quartile of recipients received a median (range) of $33 190 ($9934-$138 321) in total payments per prescriber. Payments for compensation for services other than consulting contributed the most to the total amount. Mallinckrodt payments were positively associated with greater Medicare spending on corticotropin (β = 1.079; 95% CI, 1.044-1.115; P < .001), with every $10 000 in payments associated with a 7.9% increase (approximately $53 000) in Medicare spending on corticotropin. There was no association between corticotropin-related payments and spending on prescriptions for synthetic corticosteroids. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, most nephrologists, neurologists, and rheumatologists who frequently prescribe corticotropin received corticotropin-related payments from Mallinckrodt. These findings suggest that financial conflicts of interest may be driving use of corticotropin in the Medicare program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.