Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30646072›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2018

Availability of Investigational Medicines Through the US Food and Drug Administration's Expanded Access and Compassionate Use Programs.

Jeremy Puthumana, Jennifer E Miller, Jeanie Kim, Joseph S Ross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Equity and capacity to benefit from early access to medicines schemes.International journal for equity in health · 2025
    Review
  4. Patterns of immunotherapy utilization for non-small cell lung cancer in Texas pre- and post-regulatory approval.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Multicenter Analysis of Genomically Targeted Single Patient Use Requests for Pediatric Neoplasms.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Trends in FDA drug approvals over last 2 decades: An observational study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. MosaicJournal of experimental neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeremy PuthumanaYale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Jennifer E MillerDivision of Medical Ethics, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, Bioethics International, New York.
Jeanie KimCollaboration for Research Integrity and Transparency (CRIT), Yale Law School, New Haven, Connecticut.
Joseph S RossSection of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The Right to Try Act of 2017 allows patients with life-threatening conditions to access investigational medicines outside clinical trials without oversight from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). A better understanding of existing expanded access programs can inform the consideration and implementation of both the federal Right to Try Act and state right-to-try laws. Objective: To determine the timing and duration of expanded access programs for investigational medicines initiated prior to FDA approval. Design and Setting: This cross-sectional study examined expanded access and compassionate use programs registered through August 1, 2017, identified from ClinicalTrials.gov and publicly available FDA documents. Main Outcomes and Measures: Start date of each program and 3 key regulatory dates (investigational new drug application activation, initial new drug application submission, and FDA approval), and timing and duration of expanded access availability in relation to new drug application submission and FDA approval. Results: Through ClinicalTrials.gov, 92 FDA-approved drugs and biologics with associated expanded access programs initiated prior to FDA approval were identified. These programs were initiated between September 1996 and June 2017 for medicines that were most commonly used to treat cancer (n = 46 [50.0%]); metabolic, endocrine, and genetic diseases (n = 16 [17.4%]); and infectious diseases (n = 14 [15.2%]). The median (interquartile range) premarket expanded access availability was 10.0 (6.0-19.5) months, constituting a median (interquartile range) of 14% (7%-25%) of the premarket clinical development period (investigational new drug application activation to FDA approval). Of 92 expanded access programs, 64 (69.6%) were initiated just before or after new drug application submission: 24 (26.1%) were initiated during the 6-month period before, and 40 (43.5%) in the 6 months after. Conclusions and Relevance: Over the past 2 decades, expanded access programs have provided access to investigational medicines for which evidence of safety and effectiveness was established. For medicines that ultimately receive FDA approval, these findings suggest that the FDA and pharmaceutical industry have established a balance between investigational new drug access and protection of patients from therapies without established safety. This balance may be compromised by policy makers seeking to speed access to investigational medicines through the Right to Try Act.

Indexed as

Compassionate Use TrialsCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualDrug ApprovalDrug IndustryDrugs, InvestigationalHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLegislation, DrugPharmaceutical PreparationsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationDrugs, InvestigationalPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID30646072
PMCPMC6324420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.