ArticleJAMA network open2018
Temporal Trends and Center Variation in Early Antibiotic Use Among Premature Infants.
Article in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
92 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between Antenatal Antibiotic Exposure and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Model-Averaged Meta-Analysis.Neonatology · 2024Pooled it
- Presepsin for the Diagnosis of Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA pediatrics · 2022Pooled it
- Association of initial empirical antibiotic therapy with increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis.European journal of pediatrics · 2020Pooled it
- The Goldilocks zone of optimal antimicrobial stewardship in preterm infants.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Sepsis and Antibiotics in Extremely Preterm Infants: Early Empirical Treatment Was Common, While Late-Onset Sepsis Accounted for Most Cases and Antibiotic Use.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Use in U.S. Hospitals: Comparison of 2015 and 2023 Prevalence Surveys.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Evaluating the duration of post-discontinuation therapeutic ampicillin exposures in preterm infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Long-term sustainability and safety of a delivery-based early-onset sepsis evaluation strategy for very low birth weight infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- CoNS blood culture isolates from very preterm infants: antibiotic susceptibility, synergy testing andJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Article
- Early empiric antibiotic exposure affects gut microbiota development of very preterm infants.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Clinical risk factors predicting likelihood of pathogenic genetic result in NICU patients.Genetics in medicine open · 2026Article
- Implementation of the early-onset sepsis calculator in a tertiary care NICU.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
- Identifying Infants <32 Weeks' Gestation at Low Risk of Early-Onset Sepsis: A 10-Year Retrospective Study from Western Australia.Neonatology · 2026Article
- The Gut Resistome Atlas in Preterm Infants Enables Prediction of Necrotizing Enterocolitis Onset.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Serial physical examination to reduce unnecessary antibiotic exposure in newborn infants: a population-based study.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2025Article
- Development of the preterm infant gut and gastric residuals microbiome.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Factorial vignettes describe suspected early onset sepsis practice variation in a multicenter NICU antibiotic stewardship collaborative.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Article
- Neonatology: First Exposure to Antibiotics from the Ethical Perspective of Parents, Physicians, and Regulators.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Consequences of host-microbiome interactions in preterm infants.Infection and immunity · 2025Review
- Use of Antibiotics and Severe Bacterial Infections Within the First 6 Months of Life-A Population-Based Cohort Study From East Denmark.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2025Article
32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Premature infants are frequently administered empirical antibiotic therapy at birth. Early and prolonged antibiotic exposures among infants without culture-confirmed infection have been associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes. Objective: To examine early antibiotic use among premature infants over time and across hospitals in the United States. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used a comprehensive administrative database of inpatient encounters from 297 academic and community hospitals across the United States to examine data concerning very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants (<1500 g), including extremely low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants (<1000 g), who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit and survived for at least 1 day. Data collection took place in November 2015 and analysis took place from February 2016 to November 2016. Exposures: Antibiotic initiation within the first 3 days of age and subsequent antibiotic administration for more than 5 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: Temporal trends in early antibiotic initiation and duration from 2009 to 2015, and center variation in early antibiotic use from 2014 to 2015. Results: We identified 40 364 VLBW infants (20 447 female [50.7%]) who survived for at least 1 day, including 12 947 ELBW infants, from 297 centers. The majority of premature infants had early antibiotic initiation (31 715 VLBW infants [78.6%] and 11 264 ELBW infants [87.0%]), and no differences were observed over time in temporal trend analyses (P = .12 for VLBW and P = .52 for ELBW). The annual risk difference in the proportion of VLBW infants administered early antibiotic therapy ranged from -0.75% (95% CI, -1.61% to 0.11%) to -0.87% (95% CI, -2.04% to 0.30%); in ELBW infants the annual risk difference ranged from -0.34% (95% CI, -1.28% to 0.61%) to -0.38% (95% CI, -1.61% to 0.85%). There was a small but significant decrease over time in the rate of prolonged antibiotic duration for VLBW infants (P = .02), but not for ELBW infants (P = .22). The annual risk difference in the proportion of VLBW infants with prolonged antibiotic duration ranged from -0.94% (95% CI, -1.65% to -0.23%) to -1.08% (95% CI, -2.00% to -0.16%); in ELBW infants the annual risk difference ranged from -0.72% (95% CI, -1.83% to 0.39%) to -0.75% (95% CI, -1.96% to 0.46%). We also observed variation in early antibiotic exposures across centers. Sixty-nine of 113 centers (61.1%) started antibiotic therapy for more than 75% of VLBW infants, and 56 of 66 centers (84.8%) started antibiotic therapy for more than 75% of ELBW infants. The proportion of VLBW and ELBW infants administered prolonged antibiotics ranged from 0% to 80.4% and 0% to 92.0% across centers, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Most premature infants in this study received empirical early antibiotic therapy with little change over a recent 7-year period. The variability in exposure rates across centers, however, suggests that neonatal antimicrobial stewardship efforts are warranted to optimize antibiotic use for VLBW and ELBW infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.