Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30646054›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2018

Temporal Trends and Center Variation in Early Antibiotic Use Among Premature Infants.

Dustin D Flannery, Rachael K Ross, Sagori Mukhopadhyay, Alison C Tribble, Karen M Puopolo, Jeffrey S Gerber

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluating the duration of post-discontinuation therapeutic ampicillin exposures in preterm infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  8. Long-term sustainability and safety of a delivery-based early-onset sepsis evaluation strategy for very low birth weight infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Implementation of the early-onset sepsis calculator in a tertiary care NICU.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dustin D FlanneryCenter for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Rachael K RossCenter for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Sagori MukhopadhyayCenter for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Alison C TribbleDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, C. S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Karen M PuopoloCenter for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jeffrey S GerberCenter for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USPhiladelphia University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Pediatric Hospital Epidemiology and Outcomes Research Training ProgramT32HD060550 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI Christopher Peter Bonafide, John Chris Feudtner · 2010 to 2026
$6.8M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD060550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Premature infants are frequently administered empirical antibiotic therapy at birth. Early and prolonged antibiotic exposures among infants without culture-confirmed infection have been associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes. Objective: To examine early antibiotic use among premature infants over time and across hospitals in the United States. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used a comprehensive administrative database of inpatient encounters from 297 academic and community hospitals across the United States to examine data concerning very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants (<1500 g), including extremely low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants (<1000 g), who were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit and survived for at least 1 day. Data collection took place in November 2015 and analysis took place from February 2016 to November 2016. Exposures: Antibiotic initiation within the first 3 days of age and subsequent antibiotic administration for more than 5 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: Temporal trends in early antibiotic initiation and duration from 2009 to 2015, and center variation in early antibiotic use from 2014 to 2015. Results: We identified 40 364 VLBW infants (20 447 female [50.7%]) who survived for at least 1 day, including 12 947 ELBW infants, from 297 centers. The majority of premature infants had early antibiotic initiation (31 715 VLBW infants [78.6%] and 11 264 ELBW infants [87.0%]), and no differences were observed over time in temporal trend analyses (P = .12 for VLBW and P = .52 for ELBW). The annual risk difference in the proportion of VLBW infants administered early antibiotic therapy ranged from -0.75% (95% CI, -1.61% to 0.11%) to -0.87% (95% CI, -2.04% to 0.30%); in ELBW infants the annual risk difference ranged from -0.34% (95% CI, -1.28% to 0.61%) to -0.38% (95% CI, -1.61% to 0.85%). There was a small but significant decrease over time in the rate of prolonged antibiotic duration for VLBW infants (P = .02), but not for ELBW infants (P = .22). The annual risk difference in the proportion of VLBW infants with prolonged antibiotic duration ranged from -0.94% (95% CI, -1.65% to -0.23%) to -1.08% (95% CI, -2.00% to -0.16%); in ELBW infants the annual risk difference ranged from -0.72% (95% CI, -1.83% to 0.39%) to -0.75% (95% CI, -1.96% to 0.46%). We also observed variation in early antibiotic exposures across centers. Sixty-nine of 113 centers (61.1%) started antibiotic therapy for more than 75% of VLBW infants, and 56 of 66 centers (84.8%) started antibiotic therapy for more than 75% of ELBW infants. The proportion of VLBW and ELBW infants administered prolonged antibiotics ranged from 0% to 80.4% and 0% to 92.0% across centers, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Most premature infants in this study received empirical early antibiotic therapy with little change over a recent 7-year period. The variability in exposure rates across centers, however, suggests that neonatal antimicrobial stewardship efforts are warranted to optimize antibiotic use for VLBW and ELBW infants.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDatabases, FactualDrug UtilizationFemaleHospitalsHumansInfant, Extremely Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureLogistic ModelsMaleRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID30646054
PMCPMC6324528
OpenAlexW2806607213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.