Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30646047›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2018

Effect of Usual Medical Care Plus Chiropractic Care vs Usual Medical Care Alone on Pain and Disability Among US Service Members With Low Back Pain: A Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Trial.

Christine M Goertz, Cynthia R Long, Robert D Vining, Katherine A Pohlman, Joan Walter, Ian Coulter

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01692275 nacompletednot on this map

Assessment of Chiropractic Treatment for Low Back Pain and Smoking Cessation in Military Active Duty Personnel

TypeinterventionalSponsorRANDRan2012 to 2016Enrolled750ConditionsLower Back PainArmsMedical Care + Chiropractic Care, Conventional Medical Care Only
NCT06576739 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Duration of Chiropractic Spinal Manipulation in Chronic Back Pain With the Inclusion of Vitamins B6, B9, and B12: A Pilot, Placebo-Controlled, Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Western StatesRan2024 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsRecurrent Low Back PainArmsSpinal Manipulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Chiropractic Treatment of Dairy Cows.Veterinary sciences · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Christine M GoertzPalmer College of Chiropractic, Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, Iowa.
Cynthia R LongPalmer College of Chiropractic, Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, Iowa.
Robert D ViningPalmer College of Chiropractic, Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Davenport, Iowa.
Katherine A PohlmanParker University Research Institute, Dallas, Texas.
Joan WalterSamueli Institute for Information Biology, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Ian CoulterRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Palmer College of Chiropractic · USParker University · USRAND Corporation · USSamueli Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: It is critically important to evaluate the effect of nonpharmacological treatments on low back pain and associated disability. Objective: To determine whether the addition of chiropractic care to usual medical care results in better pain relief and pain-related function when compared with usual medical care alone. Design, Setting, and Participants: A 3-site pragmatic comparative effectiveness clinical trial using adaptive allocation was conducted from September 28, 2012, to February 13, 2016, at 2 large military medical centers in major metropolitan areas and 1 smaller hospital at a military training site. Eligible participants were active-duty US service members aged 18 to 50 years with low back pain from a musculoskeletal source. Interventions: The intervention period was 6 weeks. Usual medical care included self-care, medications, physical therapy, and pain clinic referral. Chiropractic care included spinal manipulative therapy in the low back and adjacent regions and additional therapeutic procedures such as rehabilitative exercise, cryotherapy, superficial heat, and other manual therapies. Main Outcomes and Measures: Coprimary outcomes were low back pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale; scores ranging from 0 [no low back pain] to 10 [worst possible low back pain]) and disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire; scores ranging from 0-24, with higher scores indicating greater disability) at 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes included perceived improvement, satisfaction (Numerical Rating Scale; scores ranging from 0 [not at all satisfied] to 10 [extremely satisfied]), and medication use. The coprimary outcomes were modeled with linear mixed-effects regression over baseline and weeks 2, 4, 6, and 12. Results: Of the 806 screened patients who were recruited through either clinician referrals or self-referrals, 750 were enrolled (250 at each site). The mean (SD) participant age was 30.9 (8.7) years, 175 participants (23.3%) were female, and 243 participants (32.4%) were nonwhite. Statistically significant site × time × group interactions were found in all models. Adjusted mean differences in scores at week 6 were statistically significant in favor of usual medical care plus chiropractic care compared with usual medical care alone overall for low back pain intensity (mean difference, -1.1; 95% CI, -1.4 to -0.7), disability (mean difference, -2.2; 95% CI, -3.1 to -1.2), and satisfaction (mean difference, 2.5; 95% CI, 2.1 to 2.8) as well as at each site. Adjusted odd ratios at week 6 were also statistically significant in favor of usual medical care plus chiropractic care overall for perceived improvement (odds ratio = 0.18; 95% CI, 0.13-0.25) and self-reported pain medication use (odds ratio = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.97). No serious related adverse events were reported. Conclusions and Relevance: Chiropractic care, when added to usual medical care, resulted in moderate short-term improvements in low back pain intensity and disability in active-duty military personnel. This trial provides additional support for the inclusion of chiropractic care as a component of multidisciplinary health care for low back pain, as currently recommended in existing guidelines. However, study limitations illustrate that further research is needed to understand longer-term outcomes as well as how patient heterogeneity and intervention variations affect patient responses to chiropractic care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01692275.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChiropracticCombined Modality TherapyDisability EvaluationFemaleHospitals, MilitaryHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedMilitary PersonnelPain MeasurementTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30646047
PMCPMC6324527
OpenAlexW2803363671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.