Trial reportJAMA network open2018
Effect of Usual Medical Care Plus Chiropractic Care vs Usual Medical Care Alone on Pain and Disability Among US Service Members With Low Back Pain: A Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessment of Chiropractic Treatment for Low Back Pain and Smoking Cessation in Military Active Duty Personnel
Efficacy and Duration of Chiropractic Spinal Manipulation in Chronic Back Pain With the Inclusion of Vitamins B6, B9, and B12: A Pilot, Placebo-Controlled, Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of guideline-recommended medications prescribed for treatment of low back pain.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Mediators of the effect of chiropractic care on 12- and 52-week outcomes for U.S. active-duty military personnel with low back pain: secondary analysis of a clinical trial.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2026Trial
- Longer-term chiropractic care outcomes for US active-duty military personnel with low back pain: secondary analysis of a pragmatic clinical trial.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Effect of chiropractic care on low back pain for active-duty military members: Mediation through biopsychosocial factors.PloS one · 2024Trial
- Thoracolumbar fascia mobility and chronic low back pain: Phase 2 of a pilot and feasibility study including multimodal chiropractic care.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2022Trial
- Health-Related Quality of Life Among United States Service Members with Low Back Pain Receiving Usual Care Plus Chiropractic Care vs Usual Care Alone: Secondary Outcomes of a Pragmatic Clinical Trial.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2022Trial
- Effectiveness of chiropractic care for low back pain: protocol for an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2026Article
- Spectral clustering identifies patterns of chiropractic care in a national longitudinal cohort.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Health care epidemiology, characteristics, and regional variation of chiropractic care in Switzerland: a descriptive study using insurance claims data.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Impact of chiropractic care on opioid use for noncancer spine pain: systematic review and meta-analysis.Pain reports · 2026Review
- Article
- Musculoskeletal pain among South African flight Attendants: A cross-sectional study.Journal of chiropractic humanities · 2025Article
- Chiropractic Services and Employment Characteristics within U.S. Federally Qualified Health Centers: Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of integrative and complementary medicine · 2025Article
- A multi-level implementation strategy to increase adoption of chiropractic care for low back pain in primary care clinics: a randomized stepped-wedge pilot study protocol.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2025Article
- Treatment preferences among Canadian military Veterans with chronic low back pain: Mixed-methods cross-sectional survey.Journal of military, veteran and family health · 2025Article
- Chiropractic Treatment of Dairy Cows.Veterinary sciences · 2024Article
- Lack of pragmatic attitude of self-labelled pragmatic trials on manual therapy: a methodological review.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Review
- Neuroplastic Responses to Chiropractic Care: Broad Impacts on Pain, Mood, Sleep, and Quality of Life.Brain sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: It is critically important to evaluate the effect of nonpharmacological treatments on low back pain and associated disability. Objective: To determine whether the addition of chiropractic care to usual medical care results in better pain relief and pain-related function when compared with usual medical care alone. Design, Setting, and Participants: A 3-site pragmatic comparative effectiveness clinical trial using adaptive allocation was conducted from September 28, 2012, to February 13, 2016, at 2 large military medical centers in major metropolitan areas and 1 smaller hospital at a military training site. Eligible participants were active-duty US service members aged 18 to 50 years with low back pain from a musculoskeletal source. Interventions: The intervention period was 6 weeks. Usual medical care included self-care, medications, physical therapy, and pain clinic referral. Chiropractic care included spinal manipulative therapy in the low back and adjacent regions and additional therapeutic procedures such as rehabilitative exercise, cryotherapy, superficial heat, and other manual therapies. Main Outcomes and Measures: Coprimary outcomes were low back pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale; scores ranging from 0 [no low back pain] to 10 [worst possible low back pain]) and disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire; scores ranging from 0-24, with higher scores indicating greater disability) at 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes included perceived improvement, satisfaction (Numerical Rating Scale; scores ranging from 0 [not at all satisfied] to 10 [extremely satisfied]), and medication use. The coprimary outcomes were modeled with linear mixed-effects regression over baseline and weeks 2, 4, 6, and 12. Results: Of the 806 screened patients who were recruited through either clinician referrals or self-referrals, 750 were enrolled (250 at each site). The mean (SD) participant age was 30.9 (8.7) years, 175 participants (23.3%) were female, and 243 participants (32.4%) were nonwhite. Statistically significant site × time × group interactions were found in all models. Adjusted mean differences in scores at week 6 were statistically significant in favor of usual medical care plus chiropractic care compared with usual medical care alone overall for low back pain intensity (mean difference, -1.1; 95% CI, -1.4 to -0.7), disability (mean difference, -2.2; 95% CI, -3.1 to -1.2), and satisfaction (mean difference, 2.5; 95% CI, 2.1 to 2.8) as well as at each site. Adjusted odd ratios at week 6 were also statistically significant in favor of usual medical care plus chiropractic care overall for perceived improvement (odds ratio = 0.18; 95% CI, 0.13-0.25) and self-reported pain medication use (odds ratio = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.97). No serious related adverse events were reported. Conclusions and Relevance: Chiropractic care, when added to usual medical care, resulted in moderate short-term improvements in low back pain intensity and disability in active-duty military personnel. This trial provides additional support for the inclusion of chiropractic care as a component of multidisciplinary health care for low back pain, as currently recommended in existing guidelines. However, study limitations illustrate that further research is needed to understand longer-term outcomes as well as how patient heterogeneity and intervention variations affect patient responses to chiropractic care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01692275.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.