ArticleClinical rheumatology2019
YouTube as a source of patient information for ankylosing spondylitis exercises.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Physical Activity Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review.JMIR infodemiology · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effects of telerehabilitation and YouTube platform-based exercise videos in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: a randomized controlled study.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Trial
- Reliability and quality of YouTube exercise videos for people living with lung cancer: a cross-sectional content analysis.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Content quality and reliability of YouTube exercise videos for Parkinson's disease.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Article
- Quality, reliability, and educational value of YouTube™ videos on Pavlik harness treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Evaluating the quality, reliability and readability of digital and artificial intelligence resources for adults with cancer who have significant caregiving responsibilities for children.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- YouTube as a tool for core stability exercise training a content evaluation study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Analyzing Turkish-Language HPV Vaccination Videos on YouTube: Assessing Content Quality and Educational Value.Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2025Article
- Single-Position Lumbar Fusion Online Videos for Patient Education: Understandability, Reliability, and Quality.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025Article
- Article
- Evaluating the Quality and Reliability of YouTube as a Source of Information on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Call to Publish More Quality Videos by Professionals.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- YouTube as a possible learning platform for patients and their family caregivers for gastrostomy tube feeding: A cross-sectional study.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025Article
- YouTube as a source of information for stroke rehabilitation: a cross-sectional analysis of quality and reliability of videos.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Assessment of the quality and reliability of YouTube videos related to teleradiology in musculoskeletal and rheumatic diseases: a cross-sectional study.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Quality and reliability evaluation of YouTube® exercises content for temporomandibular disorders.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Professionalism vs. engagement: quality of SSc information on WeChat.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Assessing quality and reliability of online videos on tachycardia: a YouTube video-based study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Taking a Closer Look: "Evaluating Online Video Content for Rehabilitation after Distal Radius Fracture".Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
objectivesAnkylosing spondylitis (AS) is a rheumatic disorder characterized by structural impairments and postural deformities which restrict daily life activities. Nonpharmacologic methods, particularly exercise therapies, play a key role in the treatment. Obtaining online health-related information has become increasingly popular. We aimed to assess the quality of the most viewed YouTube videos on AS exercises.
methodWe searched for the key words "ankylosing spondylitis exercise," "ankylosing spondylitis rehabilitation," "ankylosing spondylitis physical therapy," and "ankylosing spondylitis physiotherapy" on YouTube on October 10th, 2018. The educational quality of YouTube videos was evaluated according to the Global Quality Scale, and three groups were formed: high quality, intermediate, and low quality. Video parameters were compared between the groups.
resultsOf the 56 videos evaluated, 48.2% (n = 27) were of high quality, 17.9% (n = 10) were of intermediate quality, and 33.9% (n = 19) were of low quality. When video parameters compared among the groups, no significant differences were found in the number of views per day, likes per day, and comments per day (p > 0.05). Significant differences were found in the number of dislikes per day and DISCERN scores between the groups (p = 0.02, p < 0.001, respectively).
conclusionsYouTube can be considered as an important source of high-quality videos. Nearly half of the videos were of high quality. Physicians should inform patients about the importance of video resources during the use of YouTube and should guide patients to the accurate sources of information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30645752What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.