Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30645703›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2019

Pregnancy rates after pre-implantation genetic screening for aneuploidy are only superior when trophectoderm biopsy is performed on hatching embryos.

Sonali Singh, Elie Hobeika, Eric S Knochenhauer, Michael L Traub

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Non-invasive Chromosome Screening Strategy for PrioritizingFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Meddling with new technologies or amending an embryos' potential.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sonali SinghObstetrics and Gynecology, Staten Island University Hospital, 475 Seaview Avenue, Staten Island, NY, 10305, USA.
Elie HobeikaObstetrics and Gynecology, Staten Island University Hospital, 475 Seaview Avenue, Staten Island, NY, 10305, USA.
Eric S KnochenhauerObstetrics and Gynecology, Staten Island University Hospital, 475 Seaview Avenue, Staten Island, NY, 10305, USA.
Michael L TraubObstetrics and Gynecology, Staten Island University Hospital, 475 Seaview Avenue, Staten Island, NY, 10305, USA. traubml@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1283-6230
Staten Island University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn vitro fertilization with trophectoderm embryo biopsy and pre-implantation genetic screening with comprehensive chromosomal screening (PGS-CCS) for aneuploidy is becoming increasingly more popular. Embryos are cryopreserved and implanted in a subsequent frozen thawed embryo transfer cycle (FET). No studies have investigated differences in pregnancy outcomes by timing of trophectoderm biopsy relative to stages of blastocyst development.

methodsRetrospective study of all patients (n = 363) at a single IVF center between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2016 undergoing single embryo transfer with PGS-CCS where embryos were cryopreserved with subsequent FET. Embryo expansion and grading was assessed both at the time of biopsy and transfer. Pregnancy rates were analyzed by embryo expansion and embryo grading.

resultsImplantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates improved significantly with increased embryo expansion at the time of embryo biopsy (P < 0.001). Pregnancy loss decreased with increases in embryo expansion prior to biopsy (P < 0.001). Superior live birth rates with PGS-CCS were seen when embryos were hatching at the time of biopsy (p < 0.001). For fresh and frozen embryo transfers without PGS-CCS, embryo expansion did not affect pregnancy outcomes.

conclusionsPGS-CCS significantly increases implantation and live birth rates only if embryos are hatching at the time of biopsy. The embryo biopsy itself on a non-hatching embryo significantly damages the embryo in ways which are not reflected in future embryo expansion. IVF labs should wait until embryos hatch before performing trophectoderm biopsy.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousAdultAneuploidyBiopsyBirth RateBlastocystCryopreservationEctodermEmbryo ImplantationEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleFertilization in VitroGenetic TestingHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeComplete chromosomal screeningEmbryo biopsyEmbryo expansionFETIVFPGS

Identifiers

PMID30645703
PMCPMC6505019
OpenAlexW2908666535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.