ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2019
[New guidelines for the diagnosis of irreversible loss of brain function : Concept and limitations, organizational demands, and implementation].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Diagnosis of irreversible loss of brain function ("brain death")-what is new?]Der Nervenarzt · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2015, the German Medical Association (Bundesärztekammer) issued new guidelines on the diagnosis of the "irreversible loss of brain function" (ILBF). ILBF replaced the colloquial term "brain death" in order to leave the notion that concepts of death might vary such as "cardiac death" or "apparent death" and stress the objective medical-scientific matter. The German Transplantation Law describes ILBF as "the final, irreversible loss of all function of the cerebrum, cerebellum, and brainstem." The new guidelines are to be followed closely. They demand higher qualifications of physicians involved in the diagnosis of ILBF and emphasize at the same time the interdisciplinary approach and the mandatory involvement of at least one specialist in the neurological field. Several technical methods were added as additional tools to support the ILBF diagnosis such as CT-angiography and duplex ultrasound of brain and neck vessels. The new guidelines thereby raise the impact of demonstrating complete cerebral circulatory arrest but leave other options to prove irreversibility. Many procedures, such as the apnea test, were specified in more detail. This article summarizes the new features of the new guideline with a practical overview on who must be involved in the diagnosis of ILBF, how often, how the diagnosis is achieved stepwise from stage I to III and how it is secured as well as what technical methods may be involved at what stage of the procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.