Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30645055›Full record

ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2019

Nitric Oxide Therapy for Diabetic Wound Healing.

Maggie J Malone-Povolny, Sara E Maloney, Mark H Schoenfisch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 166 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
166citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

166 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Gas entrapping materials for damage control.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

106 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maggie J Malone-PovolnyDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Sara E MaloneyDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Mark H SchoenfischDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2212-0658

Funding

Role of diabetes and nitric oxide release duration on analytical performance of in vivo glucose biosensorsR01DK108318 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SCHOENFISCH, MARK H · 2016 to 2023
$4.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK108318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO) represents a potential wound therapeutic agent due to its ability to regulate inflammation and eradicate bacterial infections. Two broad strategies exist to utilize NO for wound healing; liberating NO from endogenous reservoirs, and supplementing NO from exogenous sources. This progress report examines the efficacy of a variety of NO-based methods to improve wound outcomes, with particular attention given to diabetes-associated chronic wounds.

Indexed as

Wound HealingAnimalsChronic DiseaseDiabetes MellitusDisease Models, AnimalHumansNitric OxideNitric Oxidechronic woundsdiabetesnitric oxidewound healing

Identifiers

PMID30645055
PMCPMC6774257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.