Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30644981›Full record

Observational studyJAMA2019

Association of Initial Disease-Modifying Therapy With Later Conversion to Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.

J William L Brown, Alasdair Coles, Dana Horakova, Eva Havrdova, Guillermo Izquierdo, Alexandre Prat, Marc Girard, Pierre Duquette, Maria Trojano, Alessandra Lugaresi and 31 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 228 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
228citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04466150 phase4active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Ocrelizumab on Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers at Multiple Sclerosis Onset

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2020 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsRelapsing Multiple Sclerosis, Clinically Isolated SyndromeArmsOcrelizumab
NCT07235644 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety in Patients Switching From MabThera® to Rixathon® in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: an Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUppsala UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled184ConditionsMS (Multiple Sclerosis), Multiple Sclerosis (MS) - Relapsing-remitting, Multiple Sclerosis (Relapsing Remitting)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

228 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Azathioprine for people with multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Does the inclusion of societal costs change the economic evaluations recommendations? A systematic review for multiple sclerosis disease.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Astrocytes in Multiple Sclerosis: Getting to the Core.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

168 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

41 authors.

J William L BrownDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Alasdair ColesDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Dana HorakovaDepartment of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Eva HavrdovaDepartment of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Guillermo IzquierdoHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain.
Alexandre PratHopital Notre Dame, Montreal, Canada.
Marc GirardHopital Notre Dame, Montreal, Canada.
Pierre DuquetteHopital Notre Dame, Montreal, Canada.
Maria TrojanoDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Alessandra LugaresiDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna and IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Roberto BergamaschiIRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Pierre GrammondCISSS Chaudi're-Appalache, Centre-Hospitalier, Levis, Canada.
Raed AlroughaniAmiri Hospital, Qurtoba, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
Raymond HuppertsZuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands.
Pamela McCombeUniversity of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital.
Vincent Van PeschCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Patrizia SolaDepartment of Neuroscience, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Modena, Italy.
Diana FerraroDepartment of Neuroscience, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Modena, Italy.
Francois Grand'MaisonNeuro Rive-Sud, Greenfield Park, Quebec, Canada.
Murat TerziMedical Faculty, Ondokuz Mayis University, Kurupelit, Turkey.
Jeannette Lechner-ScottSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University Newcastle, Australia.
Schlomo FlechterAsaf Harofen Medical Center, Beer-Yaakov, Zerifin, Israel.
Mark SleeFlinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Vahid ShaygannejadIsfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Eugenio PucciUOC Neurologia, Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale Marche, Macerata, Italy.
Franco GranellaUniversity of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Vilija JokubaitisDepartment of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Mark WillisDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neuroscience, Cardiff University, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Claire RiceDepartment of Neurology, Southmead Hospital, and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Neil ScoldingDepartment of Neurology, Southmead Hospital, and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Alastair WilkinsDepartment of Neurology, Southmead Hospital, and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Owen R PearsonAbertawe Bro, Morgannwg University Local Health Board, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Tjalf ZiemssenCenter of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, MS Center Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Michael HutchinsonSchool of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University College Dublin, St Vincent's University, Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Katharine HardingInstitute for Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Wales.
Joanne JonesDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Christopher McGuiganSchool of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University College Dublin, St Vincent's University, Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Helmut ButzkuevenDepartment of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Tomas KalincikClinical Outcomes Research Unit, Melbourne Brain Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Neil RobertsonInstitute for Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Wales.
MSBase Study Group

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L010305/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Within 2 decades of onset, 80% of untreated patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) convert to a phase of irreversible disability accrual termed secondary progressive MS. The association between disease-modifying treatments (DMTs), and this conversion has rarely been studied and never using a validated definition. Objective: To determine the association between the use, the type of, and the timing of DMTs with the risk of conversion to secondary progressive MS diagnosed with a validated definition. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cohort study with prospective data from 68 neurology centers in 21 countries examining patients with relapsing-remitting MS commencing DMTs (or clinical monitoring) between 1988-2012 with minimum 4 years' follow-up. Exposures: The use, type, and timing of the following DMTs: interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, fingolimod, natalizumab, or alemtuzumab. After propensity-score matching, 1555 patients were included (last follow-up, February 14, 2017). Main Outcome and Measure: Conversion to objectively defined secondary progressive MS. Results: Of the 1555 patients, 1123 were female (mean baseline age, 35 years [SD, 10]). Patients initially treated with glatiramer acetate or interferon beta had a lower hazard of conversion to secondary progressive MS than matched untreated patients (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61-0.81; P < .001; 5-year absolute risk, 12% [49 of 407] vs 27% [58 of 213]; median follow-up, 7.6 years [IQR, 5.8-9.6]), as did fingolimod (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.62; P < .001; 5-year absolute risk, 7% [6 of 85] vs 32% [56 of 174]; median follow-up, 4.5 years [IQR, 4.3-5.1]); natalizumab (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43-0.86; P = .005; 5-year absolute risk, 19% [16 of 82] vs 38% [62 of 164]; median follow-up, 4.9 years [IQR, 4.4-5.8]); and alemtuzumab (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.32-0.85; P = .009; 5-year absolute risk, 10% [4 of 44] vs 25% [23 of 92]; median follow-up, 7.4 years [IQR, 6.0-8.6]). Initial treatment with fingolimod, alemtuzumab, or natalizumab was associated with a lower risk of conversion than initial treatment with glatiramer acetate or interferon beta (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-0.99; P = .046); 5-year absolute risk, 7% [16 of 235] vs 12% [46 of 380]; median follow-up, 5.8 years [IQR, 4.7-8.0]). The probability of conversion was lower when glatiramer acetate or interferon beta was started within 5 years of disease onset vs later (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.98; P = .03; 5-year absolute risk, 3% [4 of 120] vs 6% [2 of 38]; median follow-up, 13.4 years [IQR, 11-18.1]). When glatiramer acetate or interferon beta were escalated to fingolimod, alemtuzumab, or natalizumab within 5 years vs later, the HR was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.66-0.88; P < .001; 5-year absolute risk, 8% [25 of 307] vs 14% [46 of 331], median follow-up, 5.3 years [IQR], 4.6-6.1). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with relapsing-remitting MS, initial treatment with fingolimod, alemtuzumab, or natalizumab was associated with a lower risk of conversion to secondary progressive MS vs initial treatment with glatiramer acetate or interferon beta. These findings, considered along with these therapies' risks, may help inform decisions about DMT selection.

Indexed as

AdultAlemtuzumabCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleFingolimod HydrochlorideGlatiramer AcetateHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunosuppressive AgentsInterferon-betaMaleMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingNatalizumabTime-to-TreatmentAlemtuzumabFingolimod HydrochlorideGlatiramer AcetateImmunologic FactorsImmunosuppressive AgentsInterferon-betaNatalizumab

Identifiers

PMID30644981
PMCPMC6439772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.