ArticleJAMA network open2019
Comparison of Sales Income and Research and Development Costs for FDA-Approved Cancer Drugs Sold by Originator Drug Companies.
Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physician Interpretation of Data of Uncertain Clinical Utility in Oncology Prescription Drug Promotion.The oncologist · 2021Trial
- Quantifying Market Trajectories: A Study of Pharmaceutical Sales Uptake Curves and Related Parameters.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Article
- Lessons from drug revenue life cycles: distributions across modalities and therapeutic areas.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- What is the role of common sense oncology in the Western Pacific?The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Review
- Modelling the potential financial impacts of expanding access to immune checkpoint inhibitors as monotherapy for treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Financial challenges of being on long-term, high-cost medications.Neuro-oncology practice · 2025Review
- Marginal health care expenditures for melanoma care in the United States.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2024Article
- Investigating the availability, affordability, and market dynamics of innovative oncology drugs in Morocco: an original report.International journal for equity in health · 2024Review
- Monoclonal antibody biosimilars for cancer treatment.iScience · 2024Review
- Added benefit and revenues of oncology drugs approved by the European Medicines Agency between 1995 and 2020: retrospective cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2024Article
- Direct Medical Spending on Young and Average-Age Onset Colorectal Cancer before and after Diagnosis: a Population-Based Costing Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024Article
- Are Turkish pharmaceutical pricing strategies an access barrier to oncology medicines for Türkiye?Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- The cancer premium - explaining differences in prices for cancer vs non-cancer drugs with efficacy and epidemiological endpoints in the US, Germany, and Switzerland: a cross sectional study.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- A holistic view of innovation incentives and pharmaceutical policy reform.Health affairs scholar · 2023Article
- Health litigation and cancer survival in patients treated in the public health system in a large Brazilian city, 2014-2019.BMC public health · 2023Article
- A David and Goliath set-up: a qualitative study of the challenges of ensuring the introduction of cost-effective new cancer medicines in Finland.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2022Article
- Awareness and Perceptions among Members of a Japanese Cancer Patient Advocacy Group Concerning the Financial Relationships between the Pharmaceutical Industry and Physicians.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Repurposing existing therapeutics, its importance in oncology drug development: Kinases as a potential target.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Review
- Discovering and harnessing oxidative enzymes for chemoenzymatic synthesis and diversification of anticancer camptothecin analogues.Communications chemistry · 2021Article
- Quantifying the feasibility of shortening clinical trial duration using surrogate markers.Statistics in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: High costs and risks of research and development (R&D) have been used to justify the high prices of cancer drugs. However, what the return on R&D investment is, and by extension what a justifiable price might be, is unclear. Objective: To compare incomes from the sales of cancer drugs with the estimated R&D costs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational study used global pharmaceutical industry sales data to quantify the cumulative incomes generated from the sales of cancer drugs for companies that have held patents or marketing rights (originator companies). All cancer drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration from 1989 to 2017 were identified from the United States Food and Drug Administration's website and literature. Itemized product sales data were extracted from the originator companies' consolidated financial reports. For drugs with data missing in specific years, additional data was sought from other public sources, or where necessary, estimated values from known reported values. Drugs were excluded if there were missing data for half or more of the years since approval. Data analysis was conducted from May 2018 to October 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sales data were expressed in 2017 US dollars with adjustments for inflation. Cumulative incomes from the sales of these drugs were compared against the R&D costs estimated in the literature, which had been adjusted for the costs of capital and trial failure (risk adjusted). Results: Of the 156 US Food and Drug Administration-approved cancer drugs identified, 99 drugs (63.5%) had data for more than half of the years since approval and were included in the analysis. There was a median of 10 years (range, 1-28 years) of sales data with 1040 data points, 79 (7.6%) of which were estimated. Compared with the total risk-adjusted R&D cost of $794 million (range, $2827-$219 million) per medicine estimated in the literature, by the end of 2017, the median cumulative sales income was $14.50 (range, $3.30-$55.10) per dollar invested for R&D. Median time to fully recover the maximum possible risk-adjusted cost of R&D ($2827 million) was 5 years (range, 2-10 years; n = 56). Cancer drugs continued to generate billion-dollar returns for the originator companies after the end-of-market exclusivity, particularly for biologics. Conclusions and Relevance: Cancer drugs, through high prices, have generated returns for the originator companies far in excess of possible R&D costs. Lowering prices of cancer drugs and facilitating greater competition are essential for improving patient access, health system's financial sustainability, and future innovation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.