Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30644591›Full record

ArticleNutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition2019

High Adherence to Oral Nutrition Supplements Prescribed by Dietitians: A Cross-Sectional Study on Hospital Outpatients.

Evelina Liljeberg, Agneta Andersson, Karin Blom Malmberg, Margaretha Nydahl

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Oral nutritional supplement compliance among hospitalized cancer patients: a cross-sectional study based on the KAP model.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Ocular complications in a patient with history of bariatric surgery.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A study on the effect of nutrition education based on the goal attainment theory on oral nutritional supplementation after colorectal cancer surgery.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Preferences for oral nutritional supplement therapy among postoperative patients with gastric cancer: a discrete choice experiment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Evelina LiljebergDepartment of Food Studies, Nutrition and Dietetics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Agneta AnderssonDepartment of Food Studies, Nutrition and Dietetics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Karin Blom MalmbergDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Margaretha NydahlDepartment of Food Studies, Nutrition and Dietetics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SEUppsala University Hospital · SE

Funding

SNF Swedish Nutrition Foundation 5700 USDStiftelsen Kronprinsessan Margarets Minnesfond 60% of the salary for the PhD position of EL
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to assess adherence to oral nutrition supplements (ONS) among hospital outpatients and to assess patient characteristics, experiences of ONS, and the characteristics of ONS prescriptions in clinical practice.

methodsHospital outpatients aged ≥18 years and prescribed ONS by a dietitian at a Swedish hospital were referred to the study from September 2016 to February 2017. Data were collected from structured telephone interviews, medical records, and a register of ONS delivered. Adherence to ONS was measured by dividing self-reported intake of ONS (frequency question and 24-hour recall question) by the amount prescribed and using the medication possession ratio (MPR).

resultsOf the 96 patients included (mean age 67 ± 13 years), 52% were male. The 2 most frequent medical diagnoses were malignancy and digestive system disease. Mean adherence to ONS was 93% measured by the frequency question, 87% measured by the 24-hour recall question, and 76% according to MPR. The majority of the patients (83%) were prescribed 1-3 bottles of ONS/day. The average number of flavors of ONS delivered was 4.2. Before prescription, 69% of the patients had been allowed to taste the ONS and 92% had chosen the flavors to be prescribed. Over 75% liked the taste of the ONS and considered them to be good for their health.

conclusionsAdherence to ONS was high in this population, which might be explained by the individual tailoring of ONS prescriptions by a dietitian, positive experiences of ONS, and the relatively young mean age of the participants.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdministration, OralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDietary SupplementsDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutritionistsOutpatientsSurveys and Questionnairesmalnutritionmedical nutrition therapyoral nutrition supplementspatient compliancetreatment adherence and compliance

Identifiers

PMID30644591
PMCPMC6899765
OpenAlexW2908861916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.