Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30644570›Full record

Trial reportNeurourology and urodynamics2019

Long-term treatment of older patients with overactive bladder using a combination of mirabegron and solifenacin: a prespecified analysis from the randomized, phase III SYNERGY II study.

Elizabeth R Mueller, Rob van Maanen, Christopher Chapple, Paul Abrams, Sender Herschorn, Dudley Robinson, Matthias Stoelzel, Sang J Yoon, Salman Al-Shukri, Tomasz Rechberger and 1 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05968885 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Urodynamic Outcomes Between Intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA Injection and Combination Pharmacotherapy in Patients With Detrusor Overactivity

TypeinterventionalSponsorMackay Memorial HospitalRan2021 to 2026Enrolled300ConditionsUrinary Bladder, Overactive, Urodynamics, Effect of DrugArmsIntradetrusor Botox® (onabotulinumtoxinA) injection, Combine Mirabegron and Solifenacin.
NCT06197295 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of Solifenacin Combined With Mirabegron Versus Solifenacin With Vaginal Estrogen Cream for the Treatment of Detrusor Overactivity

TypeinterventionalSponsorMackay Memorial HospitalRan2022 to 2026Enrolled200ConditionsUrinary Bladder, Overactive, Effect of DrugArmsSolifenacin with vaginal estrogen cream, Combination pharmacotherapy
NCT06479720 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of Solifenacin or Mirabegron With Local Estrogen Versus Combination Treatment With Mirabegron and Solifenacin for Refractory Overactive Bladder

TypeinterventionalSponsorMackay Memorial HospitalRan2022 to 2026Enrolled300ConditionsEffect of Drug, Urinary Bladder, OveractiveArmsCombined pharmacotherapy with Solifenacin and Mirabegron, Solifenacin with vaginal estrogen cream, Mirabegron with vaginal estrogen cream
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Mirabegron in the Management of Overactive Bladder Syndrome.International journal of women's health · 2022
    Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

Elizabeth R MuellerLoyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois.
Rob van MaanenAstellas Pharma Global Development, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Christopher ChappleRoyal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Paul AbramsBristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Sender HerschornUniversity of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dudley RobinsonKing's College Hospital, London, UK.
Matthias StoelzelAstellas Pharma Global Development, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Sang J YoonGachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon, South Korea.
Salman Al-ShukriPavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Tomasz RechbergerMedical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Christian GratzkeUniversity of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Astellas Pharma (Netherlands) · NLFirst Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg · RUGachon University Gil Medical Center · KRHealth Sciences Centre · CAKing's College Hospital · GBLoyola University Chicago · USLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMedical University of Lublin · PLRoyal Hallamshire Hospital · GBSouthmead Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsSYNERGY II was a 12-month phase III trial in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms that investigated the safety and efficacy of the combination of mirabegron and solifenacin in comparison with each monotherapy. This analysis evaluated the trial findings using four age subgroups (<65, ≥65, <75, and ≥75 years).

methodsEligible patients were ≥18 years with symptoms of "wet" OAB (urinary frequency and urgency with incontinence) for ≥3 months. Patients were randomized to receive once-daily solifenacin succinate and mirabegron (5 mg/50 mg; combination), solifenacin succinate, or mirabegron (4:1:1). Safety evaluations: treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, and electrocardiogram, post-void residual volume, and laboratory assessments. Primary efficacy variables: change from baseline to end of treatment in number of incontinence episodes/24 h and micturitions/24 h.

resultsOf 1794 patients (full analysis set), 614 (34.2%) and 168 (9.4%) were ≥65 and ≥75 years old, respectively. Overall, 856 (47.2%) patients experienced ≥1 TEAE. Higher TEAE incidences were typically observed for the combination versus both monotherapies (eg, constipation) and in the older versus younger age groups (eg, urinary tract infection). Increases in mean pulse rate from baseline of >1 bpm were noted in the combination and mirabegron younger age groups only. No clinically significant findings were observed in the other safety parameters. The efficacy variables improved with all treatments and the greatest improvements were typically observed with combination therapy.

conclusionsMirabegron and solifenacin combination therapy was a well-tolerated and effective treatment for patients with OAB symptoms irrespective of their age.

Indexed as

AcetanilidesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSolifenacin SuccinateThiazolesTreatment OutcomeUrinary Bladder, OveractiveUrinary IncontinenceUrological AgentsAcetanilidesmirabegronSolifenacin SuccinateThiazolesUrological Agentscombinationlong-term treatmentmirabegronolder patientsoveractive bladdersolifenacin

Identifiers

PMID30644570
PMCPMC6850571
OpenAlexW2909448746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.