Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30644411›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Blood Biochemistry Analysis to Detect Smoking Status and Quantify Accelerated Aging in Smokers.

Polina Mamoshina, Kirill Kochetov, Franco Cortese, Anna Kovalchuk, Alexander Aliper, Eugene Lane, Morten Scheibye-Knudsen, Charles R Cantor, Neil M Skjodt, Olga Kovalchuk and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The doctor will polygraph you now.npj health systems · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Polina MamoshinaPharmaceutical Artificial Intelligence Department, Insilico Medicine, Inc., 9601 Medical Center Dr, Suite 127, JHU, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Kirill KochetovPharmaceutical Artificial Intelligence Department, Insilico Medicine, Inc., 9601 Medical Center Dr, Suite 127, JHU, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Franco CorteseBiogerontology Research Foundation, Research Department, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Anna KovalchukCanada Cancer and Aging Research Laboratories, Ltd, Lethbridge, Alberta, T1K7X8, Canada.
Alexander AliperPharmaceutical Artificial Intelligence Department, Insilico Medicine, Inc., 9601 Medical Center Dr, Suite 127, JHU, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Eugene LanePharmaceutical Artificial Intelligence Department, Insilico Medicine, Inc., 9601 Medical Center Dr, Suite 127, JHU, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Morten Scheibye-KnudsenCenter for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Charles R CantorBoston University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, USA.
Neil M SkjodtCanada Cancer and Aging Research Laboratories, Ltd, Lethbridge, Alberta, T1K7X8, Canada.
Olga KovalchukCanada Cancer and Aging Research Laboratories, Ltd, Lethbridge, Alberta, T1K7X8, Canada. olga.kovalchuk@uleth.ca.
Alex ZhavoronkovPharmaceutical Artificial Intelligence Department, Insilico Medicine, Inc., 9601 Medical Center Dr, Suite 127, JHU, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA. alex@insilicomedicine.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an association between smoking and cancer, cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. However, currently, there are no affordable and informative tests for assessing the effects of smoking on the rate of biological aging. In this study we demonstrate for the first time that smoking status can be predicted using blood biochemistry and cell count results andthe recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI). By employing age-prediction models developed using supervised deep learning techniques, we found that smokers exhibited higher aging rates than nonsmokers, regardless of their cholesterol ratios and fasting glucose levels. We further used those models to quantify the acceleration of biological aging due to tobacco use. Female smokers were predicted to be twice as old as their chronological age compared to nonsmokers, whereas male smokers were predicted to be one and a half times as old as their chronological age compared to nonsmokers. Our findings suggest that deep learning analysis of routine blood tests could complement or even replace the current error-prone method of self-reporting of smoking status and could be expanded to assess the effect of other lifestyle and environmental factors on aging.

Indexed as

Aging, PrematureBlood Chemical AnalysisSmokersSmokingSupervised Machine LearningAge FactorsArtificial IntelligenceBlood Cell CountDeep LearningFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID30644411
PMCPMC6333803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.