ArticleScientific reports2019
Phase partitioning during fragmentation revealed by QEMSCAN Particle Mineralogical Analysis of volcanic ash.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanoscale silicate melt textures determine volcanic ash surface chemistry.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Phases in fine volcanic ash.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Shape, size, and quantity of ingested external abrasives influence dental microwear texture formation in guinea pigs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Volcanic ash particle properties depend upon their genetic fragmentation processes. Here, we introduce QEMSCAN Particle Mineralogical Analysis (PMA) to quantify the phase distribution in ash samples collected during activity at Santiaguito, Guatemala and assess the fragmentation mechanisms. Volcanic ash from a vulcanian explosion and from a pyroclastic density current resulting from a dome collapse were selected. The ash particles resulting from both fragmentation modes are dense and blocky, typical of open-vent dome volcanoes and have a componentry consistent with their andesitic composition. We use image analysis to compare the fraction of each phase at particle boundaries compared to the total particle fraction. Our results show that the explosion-derived ash has an even distribution of plagioclase and glass, but boundaries enriched in pyroxene and amphibole. In contrast, the ash generated during dome collapse has an increased fraction of glass and decreased fraction of plagioclase at particle boundaries, suggesting that fractures preferentially propagate through glass during abrasion and milling in pyroclastic flows. This study presents QEMSCAN PMA as a new resource to identify generation mechanisms of volcanic ash, which is pertinent to volcanology, aviation, respiratory health and environmental hazards, and highlights the need for further experimental constraints on the fragmentation mechanism fingerprint.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.